Justin Clift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:<snip>
From my thinking, the goal of the site is to duplicate the success of SpreadFireFox, with OOo.
Is that what you see it's purpose to be?
when you're going to duplicate success of any site, it's extremely hard taks, because people know the previous success and they will look at your site more thoroughly.
That kind of seems wrong. We're aiming at end users' aren't we?
>From the English community point of view - it's better to create "copy" of the SpreadFirefox.com site. IOW more dynamic site.
From the whole world community point of view - it's better to create just promotion site. IOW more static site.
Um, I'm not sure how you arrived at these two thoughts.
As a potentially valuable guide, do you feel we should ask the people who successfully created SpreadFireFox, what they feel is needed to build the same kind of success?
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
If this will be done with cooperation of the MP, b) is the right answer.
Cheers, Robert
-- Executive Director Digital Distribution Global Training Services Pty. Ltd. Premier OpenOffice.org and StarOffice Online Training providers http://www.digitaldistribution.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
