On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 17:01 +0100, Charles-H.Schulz wrote: > Hello, > > Ian Lynch wrote: > > >On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 10:55 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote: > > > > > >>Finn Gruwier Larsen wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>These are my thoughs: > >>> > >>>The easter eggs question rises a bigger and more important question: who > >>>is really in charge of making decisions on the functionality of OOo? The > >>>developers or the community? > >>> > >>> > >>And who is the community? People that talk? > >> > >> > In any FOSS community, the community is made of the developpers. The one > who codes is the one who calls the shots. The rest, albeit valuable > sometimes, has no other way than respecting the developpers' decisions > or try to convince them they are wrong. There is hence no question of > separating the community and the developpers. > I thought this precision is useful, especially if we were going to make > yet another thread on how bad the OOo project is to some people. >
I recall these were part of StarOffice5.x. Since OpenOffice.org is based on this code, I am not surprized that they are still there. Nonetheless, I am on the side of those who say remove 'em. -- PLEASE KEEP MESSAGES ON THE LIST. OpenOffice.org Documentation Co-Lead http://documentation.openoffice.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
