On Tue, 23 May 2006 23:19:57 -0500, Louis Suarez-Potts
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
On 2006-05-23, at 23:54 , Alexandro Colorado wrote:
Really is our fault for not doing much 'think out of the box' like
the folks from abiword. For all our google links we could have had
some campaigns up on Google ads.
We did, at one point, a couple of years ago. A unnamed donor enabled
us to have a slew of ads for OOo. Didn't do much, which I guess is the
lesson of the Internet: it's a money drain for advertisers, funnelling
cash to Google.
Then I guess the folks at abiword are more succesful raising
advertising funds than us which is also another lesson to learn.
Huh? I didn't say it was ineffectual. OOo is very very popular and
though there was an increase, it was not to me remarkable. But what
prompts that commentary? Most people and groups actually look to OOo for
marketing and advertising: we are effective.
Best,
Louis
Ok I most have missed something, what you mean that 'didn't do much'. You
mean the advertising efforts or the donations itself.
--
Alexandro Colorado
CoLeader of OpenOffice.org ES
http://es.openoffice.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
