hi
On 2006-05-24, at 24:55 , Alexandro Colorado wrote:
On Tue, 23 May 2006 23:19:57 -0500, Louis Suarez-Potts
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
On 2006-05-23, at 23:54 , Alexandro Colorado wrote:
Really is our fault for not doing much 'think out of the box'
like the folks from abiword. For all our google links we could
have had some campaigns up on Google ads.
We did, at one point, a couple of years ago. A unnamed donor
enabled us to have a slew of ads for OOo. Didn't do much, which
I guess is the lesson of the Internet: it's a money drain for
advertisers, funnelling cash to Google.
Then I guess the folks at abiword are more succesful raising
advertising funds than us which is also another lesson to learn.
Huh? I didn't say it was ineffectual. OOo is very very popular and
though there was an increase, it was not to me remarkable. But
what prompts that commentary? Most people and groups actually look
to OOo for marketing and advertising: we are effective.
Best,
Louis
Ok I most have missed something, what you mean that 'didn't do
much'. You mean the advertising efforts or the donations itself.
Donation did a lot; advertising effort did relatively little, though
it was measurable. The point: this particular instance of a Web
advertising campaign is fairly unimportant.
--
Alexandro Colorado
CoLeader of OpenOffice.org ES
http://es.openoffice.org
best,
Louis
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
