Hi,
jonathon a écrit : > Charles-H. Schulz wrote: > > >> Okay. So who told you in advance that it would be rejected? >> > > I apologise. It wasn't you. I misremembered who sent me the > initial rejection message. > > Would you be willing to accept a template that has to go > through Sun legal, before being put in an OOo repository for > templates? Any extensions I write will have to go thru the > same process. > That is also surprizing, at least in the new context of things. If you ever wanted to bundle a template and insert it by default to OOo at the time there was no extension, it could have gone that kind of process. Understand, that would only have unfolded like that if you wanted to actually bundle your template by default. As soon as the new extensions web site would be up and running this thing will never happen, because aside some checks run by volunteers it will be put online and donwloadable as an extension. > Any localizations of either the extensions, or templates > will also have to go thru Sun legal, prior to being put in > an official OOo template repository. > Waow, that's nowhere in my book, at least with the new extensions system. You see to have inquired for this 2 or three years ago. > The templates will have to use either GNU GPL 3.0 or LGPL 3.0. > [I don't remember which organization was issued a patent > that is virtually identical to one issued during the > mid-fifties by the USPTO. The only difference is the hook up > to computer, rather than an oscilloscope, with a tracing > pen. The extension takes advantage of work done with the > patent obtained during the fifties.]] > the V 3.0? Is that your requirement? As this will be an extension you can apply any license you want... Best, Charles. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
