Kami (please pay attention to your replies, they are in the same layout style as the last post)...
Kálmán Szalai a écrit : > Hello! > > >>>> "Charles-H. Schulz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07/17/07 2:36 du. >>> >>>> > Jonathon, > > > jonathon a écrit : > >> Charles-H. Schulz wrote: >> >> >> >>> What you do, OxgenOffice, is not legally compatible with OpenOffice.org. >>> >>> >> Legally incompatible? I seriously doubt that. >> >> > > Except with the new versions of OOo with an extensions manager that > allow you to download extensions such as templates from any source, some > templates were indeed not legally compatible. > > Yes that is why I created extension package for OpenOffice.org... > > Which, by the way, eliminates much of the need of an Oxygen Office. > > > So there is a "need of an OxygenOffice" ;o) Nice to hear that... > Did I ever say there wasn't? :-) It became an issue with the perception of people and the questions around QA and packages management. > If all of bugs/enhancement request will be handled... Please refer the wiki > page about non code extensions. > > >> >> >>> - content (templates) that are not under the LGPL (OOo is under the LGPL) >>> >>> >> There was a conscious decision by Sun, to not include >> anything which was not distributed under the LGPL. That does >> not mean that such content can not be distributed with OOo >> by other vendors. >> >> > > That's right. But this is an OOo list, not Oxygen Office, nor StarOffice... > > You are right. But a template pacgage based on our collection has a positive > effect on OpenOffice.org too. Are you see this or not? > I absolutely agree. I think that this is why the extensions web site will be be highly useful. But Jonathon's point was that there could be distributors other than OOo that could embed different extensions, and so he's right but this just goes beyond the limits of our project. > >> Not all of the templates in OxygenOffice are clear about the >> licence that they are distributed under. Nonetheless, it is >> much easier to point somebody to the template package that >> Kami put together, than to try to hunt for them all over the >> Internet. >> >> > > I invite you to contribute to our new extensions web site project. > > I am ready to submit my extension available currently ooop.sf.net... You can > send the required steps for this. I'll do it... > The web site is still in the works and undergoing massive designing. Also, there is a general call that was posted on the NLC list calling for translation of the web site itslef by the Native-Language teams. If you wish to contribute to the web site design itself, please subscribe to website @ extensions dot openoffice dot org . >> >> >>> - content that is illegal in many countries (Nazi symbols, etc.) >>> >>> >> The workaround for that is to not include the content that >> might violate the laws of a country that prohibits freedom >> of expression, from being distributed in that country. >> >> Which means pointing Kami (or anybody else) towards a >> comprehensive, authoritative list of what content is banned >> in what country, under what conditions. >> >> > > I believe that we've been working with Kami about this, and so does > Sophie (but Kami does not seem to get what I'm referring to... :-( ) > > Thank you :o) But now this i a part of history, so next step here are three > new templates: > > 3DElements.ott 168 10 minutes kami_ Updated templates > Clear_advantage-Blue.ott 168 10 minutes kami_ Updated > templates > Speed_advantage-Blue.ott 168 10 minutes kami_ Updated > templates > > You can download from here: > http://ooop.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ooop/trunk/extras/source/premium/templates/misc/lang/en-US/?sortby=date#dirlist > > Please check it and make an advice how they can be better. > > Best, Charles. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
