Hi Kami, all, Kálmán Szalai wrote: > Hello! > >>>> "Charles-H. Schulz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07/17/07 >>>> 2:36 du. >>> > Jonathon, > > > jonathon a écrit : >> Charles-H. Schulz wrote: >> >> >>> What you do, OxgenOffice, is not legally compatible with >>> OpenOffice.org. >>> >> Legally incompatible? I seriously doubt that. >> > > Except with the new versions of OOo with an extensions manager that > allow you to download extensions such as templates from any source, > some templates were indeed not legally compatible. > > Yes that is why I created extension package for OpenOffice.org... > > Which, by the way, eliminates much of the need of an Oxygen Office. > > > So there is a "need of an OxygenOffice" ;o) Nice to hear that...
I, at least, never said the contrary. > > If all of bugs/enhancement request will be handled... Please refer > the wiki page about non code extensions. I don't understand this, please quote your mail correctly or the discussion will be very hard to handle. > >> >>> - content (templates) that are not under the LGPL (OOo is under >>> the LGPL) >>> >> There was a conscious decision by Sun, to not include anything >> which was not distributed under the LGPL. That does not mean that >> such content can not be distributed with OOo by other vendors. >> > > That's right. But this is an OOo list, not Oxygen Office, nor > StarOffice... > > You are right. But a template pacgage based on our collection has a > positive effect on OpenOffice.org too. Are you see this or not? We are all aware of that, provided, as I said before, that the package has no license issue and no legal issue which was not the case for the French release the last time. And believe me, it makes more burden than good in this case because of the justifications on the quality or confidence in the OOo project we have had to give. > >> Not all of the templates in OxygenOffice are clear about the >> licence that they are distributed under. Nonetheless, it is much >> easier to point somebody to the template package that Kami put >> together, than to try to hunt for them all over the Internet. >> > > I invite you to contribute to our new extensions web site project. > > I am ready to submit my extension available currently ooop.sf.net... > You can send the required steps for this. I'll do it... So could you wait until the localization process for the next release is over, and then I'll work with you on it. > >> >>> - content that is illegal in many countries (Nazi symbols, etc.) >>> >> The workaround for that is to not include the content that might >> violate the laws of a country that prohibits freedom of expression, >> from being distributed in that country. >> >> Which means pointing Kami (or anybody else) towards a >> comprehensive, authoritative list of what content is banned in what >> country, under what conditions. >> > > I believe that we've been working with Kami about this, and so does > Sophie (but Kami does not seem to get what I'm referring to... :-( ) Kami didn't come to me but to some French subscribers of our users list. > > Thank you :o) But now this i a part of history, so next step here are > three new templates: > > 3DElements.ott 168 10 minutes kami_ Updated templates > Clear_advantage-Blue.ott 168 10 minutes kami_ Updated > templates Speed_advantage-Blue.ott 168 10 minutes kami_ > Updated templates > > You can download from here: > http://ooop.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ooop/trunk/extras/source/premium/templates/misc/lang/en-US/?sortby=date#dirlist > > > Please check it and make an advice how they can be better. Kami, please, after the 26th of July could we have an irc meeting to solve all this problem ? Kind regards Sophie --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
