How do I get off this email list???  I've unsubscribed over and over!!!  Linda

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 2:03 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: [SPAM] Re: [marketing] A different Market focus

Stop Spamming me for a start. Be Patient, someone will give you answer, i 
honestly forget how myself.

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Linda Tarrant" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 8:01 PM
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [marketing] A different Market focus

> What do I have to do to get off your email list???
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Graham Lauder [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 1:34 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [marketing] A different Market focus
>
> On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 05:23:38 Juergen Schmidt wrote:
>> Hi,
>
> Hi Juergen,
>
>>
>> hey please stop to promote Google. You should think more about a neutral
>> campaign focusing on OO.org only. As far as i know Google does nothing
>> for the project. They spent some money for OOCon, fine and thanks a lot.
>> But that's it. They had kick us out of GSOC last year, they don't pay
>> for any developers, they don't pay anything or they don't do anything to
>> support the project. I asked the Google guy in Beijing if this situation
>> is going to change some time in the future and he mentioned no. So why
>> should we do a campaign where we ask people to use Google ...
>>
>> Well, most people will use it anyway but that is of course a different
>> story and we should focus on our own stuff.
>>
>> Just my 2 cents
>>
>> Juergen
>
> Whether we like it or not, in the english speaking world there are two
> googles:
> Google the noun and google the verb.
>
> Just like putting an advert on TV doesn't promote TV, we are not promoting
> Google, we are using google to promote OOo
>
> The "Google: OOo" idea is a call for action.  The idea is to incite 
> curiosity
> so that the viewer takes another step and googles OOo.  Google is merely 
> the
> tool that allows that person to take that step.  The idea is to take the
> initial promotion one step away from the computer
>
> Cheers
> GL
>
>>
>> Benjamin Horst wrote:
>> > Or how about:
>> >
>> > Why OOo? Just google it!
>> >
>> > Google might get annoyed at the use of their name as a verb, since if
>> > they don't defend it they could eventually lose the trademark.
>> >
>> > But, the text above breaks it up so that users will not confuse OOo as 
>> > a
>> > Google project. ("Google OOo" sounds like "Google Maps" or all the
>> > others.)
>> >
>> > -Ben
>> >
>> > On Jan 28, 2009, at 5:44 AM, Graham Lauder wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 23:24:49 Ivan M wrote:
>> >>> Hi Graham,
>> >>
>> >> Hi Ivan,
>> >>
>> >>> Just a small suggestion...
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:05 PM, Graham Lauder
>> >>> <[email protected]>
>> >>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>> Some months back I touted the idea of a "Google OOo" campaign.  The
>> >>>> idea
>> >>>> was to make it very easy and minimal cost for local communities to
>> >>>> produce simple flyers and posters that give a simple call to
>> >>>> action.  The
>> >>>> "Google OOo" statement would be the central part of the flyers with 
>> >>>> a
>> >>>> simple message included.  The messages would be translated into the
>> >>>> local
>> >>>> language or messages more appropriate to the local culture.  The key
>> >>>> is not to explain but to excite curiosity, to reinforce the call to 
>> >>>> an
>> >>>> action.
>> >>>
>> >>> Because Google brands some of its software with its name - e.g. 
>> >>> Google
>> >>> Earth - the flyer might appear to be advertising a piece of Google
>> >>> software - so people might search for "Google OOo" expecting 
>> >>> something
>> >>> from a Google domain. My suggestion would be to have Google "OOo", to
>> >>> make the intended action more clear.
>> >>>
>> >>> ... and the why.OOo page should be updated - at least in terms of
>> >>> design - before any major marketing campaign starts (that's not such 
>> >>> a
>> >>> small suggestion, but since I'm on a roll... :P)
>> >>>
>> >>> Regards,
>> >>> Ivan.
>> >>>
>> >>> -------------
>> >>
>> >> Good point, perhaps then a colon in the right place
>> >>
>> >> Google: OOo
>> >>
>> >> cheers
>> >> G
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> "The Best Things in life are 3"
>> >> http://why.openoffice.org
>> >>
>> >> ISO 26300 compliant
>> >>
>> >> Graham Lauder,
>> >> OpenOffice.org MarCon (Marketing Contact) NZ
>> >> http://marketing.openoffice.org/contacts.html
>> >>
>> >> INGOTs Assessor Trainer
>> >> (International Grades in Office Technologies)
>> >> www.theingots.org.nz
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> >
>> > Benjamin Horst
>> > [email protected]
>> > 646-464-2314 (ET)
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
>
> -- 
> "The Best Things in life are 3"
> http://why.openoffice.org
>
> ISO 26300 compliant
>
> Graham Lauder,
> OpenOffice.org MarCon (Marketing Contact) NZ
> http://marketing.openoffice.org/contacts.html
>
> INGOTs Assessor Trainer
> (International Grades in Office Technologies)
> www.theingots.org.nz
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to