> Actually, I don' think we should communicate. First of all, we don't really
Excuse me? we shouldnt communicate? I thought this was a Marketing group that was supposed to communicate about this kind of things. > know what he, and the US Federal gov for that matter, are going to do about > FLOSS and Open Standards. Second, speaking out first may be Maybe you don't know but I definetly want to know and will invite to find out and get more involve by communicating. > counterproductive. MS is out there and they are very powerful in D.C. as > well as elsewhere. Now, I'm pretty sure this is going to be a neat progress So whats the difference here? > from the past administration in terms of innovating in the field of IT and > procurement, but again, I don't really know what we should be saying about > it. First i would want to be more direct about "yes we can" put OOo in your federal government. We have done it with other governments and there is no reason why it wouldnt work at your office. Government adoptions of OOo is more common everyday, so there is nothing new about having the federal goverment adopting OOo without stoping everyday business operations. > best, > Charles. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- Alexandro Colorado OpenOffice.org Español IM: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
