On 1/31/10, Cor Nouws <[email protected]> wrote: > Alexandro Colorado wrote (31-01-10 20:05) >> On 1/31/10, Cor Nouws <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Alexandro Colorado wrote (31-01-10 19:12) >>>> my suggestion is to go to the education IRC rooom and understand where >>>> ericb is comming from, is just better than trying to force an answer. >>> If a project lead accuses people or situations in the project, it is >>> nothing more than reasonable that he is asked for explanation. >> >> So how is that different with what I said... he will get his explanation >> there. > > I think there is a difference. This is not about explanation to some > 'he'; it is about responsible communication on the list. > So if Eric does his statements on public list, why should we move to IRC > for explanation?
Not sure why you are discussing an advice I gave to Juergen. > Maybe IRC can be used as intermediate step, but finally this must be > resolved in the very thread on the mail list. Either short or long, but > making clear that there is understanding between the people that work in > the project, that is recognized where improvements are/may be possible, > where possible misunderstandings played a role, and which steps will > be made. Something like that. > > I've little doubt that your project lead understands that working along > these lines is important for constructive cooperation. So it's Erics turn. > > Regards, > Cor > > -- > >> Your office 2010 software: the new OpenOffice.org << > > Cor Nouws > - nl.OpenOffice.org marketing contact > - Community Council member > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- Alexandro Colorado OpenOffice.org Español IM: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
