That's only my point of view... So far everybody looks to be in-line with that. But I'd await some more days to gather feedback from some more committer before taking a resolutions. Thanks.
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 2:47 AM, Rob Atkinson <[email protected]> wrote: > FWIW my opinion is that if you are bound to a specific SQL database, it > makes no difference if its Postgres or PostGIS - so take the easy route for > now, and if you want to support alternative databases in future include the > ability to support plain Postgres as an option at that stage, > > Rob > > On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 at 03:20 Andreas Kuckartz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > If I understand this correctly then the question is if PostGIS can > > become a required PostgreSQL extension. > > > > My view: yes. If PostgreSQL can be installed then also installing > > PostGIS normally is easy. > > > > Cheers, > > Andreas > > > -- Sergio Fernández Partner Technology Manager Redlink GmbH m: +43 6602747925 e: [email protected] w: http://redlink.co
