Hi all +1 for the easy root. PostGIS is a extension also useful for other works (like SPARQL-MM). So let's become it a required extension.
Regards Thomas > Am 10.06.2016 um 10:34 schrieb Sergio Fernández <[email protected]>: > > That's only my point of view... So far everybody looks to be in-line with > that. But I'd await some more days to gather feedback from some more > committer before taking a resolutions. Thanks. > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 2:47 AM, Rob Atkinson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> FWIW my opinion is that if you are bound to a specific SQL database, it >> makes no difference if its Postgres or PostGIS - so take the easy route for >> now, and if you want to support alternative databases in future include the >> ability to support plain Postgres as an option at that stage, >> >> Rob >> >> On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 at 03:20 Andreas Kuckartz <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> If I understand this correctly then the question is if PostGIS can >>> become a required PostgreSQL extension. >>> >>> My view: yes. If PostgreSQL can be installed then also installing >>> PostGIS normally is easy. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Andreas >>> >> > > > > -- > Sergio Fernández > Partner Technology Manager > Redlink GmbH > m: +43 6602747925 > e: [email protected] > w: http://redlink.co
