Ok, I forgot that Sesame is under BSD license, so since there is no attribution clause there we can probably skip including it.
2013/3/25 Sebastian Schaffert <sebastian.schaff...@gmail.com> > Hi Andy, and other mentors, > > while trying to figure out what should go into the NOTICE file and what > not, we realised that the Apache license says that derivative works need to > contain a copy of the NOTICE of included project. So in case of our binary > releases that include the Sesame libraries, this would mean we need to > include the contents of the following file: > > https://bitbucket.org/openrdf/sesame/src/master/core/NOTICE.txt > > What we are not sure about is whether it would be ok to only mention > Sesame as we do now, or whether we need to include all the NOTICE content > of the dependency. What is your opinion on this? > > For reference, the Apache license says: > > 4d) > If the Work includes a "NOTICE" text file as part of its > distribution, then any Derivative Works that You distribute must > include a readable copy of the attribution notices contained > within such NOTICE file, excluding those notices that do not > pertain to any part of the Derivative Works, in at least one > of the following places: within a NOTICE text file distributed > as part of the Derivative Works; within the Source form or > documentation, if provided along with the Derivative Works; or, > within a display generated by the Derivative Works, if and > wherever such third-party notices normally appear. The contents > of the NOTICE file are for informational purposes only and > do not modify the License. You may add Your own attribution > notices within Derivative Works that You distribute, alongside > or as an addendum to the NOTICE text from the Work, provided > that such additional attribution notices cannot be construed > as modifying the License. > > > 2013/3/25 Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> > >> On 25/03/13 12:03, Sebastian Schaffert wrote: >> >>> restart >>> the release candidate >>> >> >> Sebastian, >> >> As Release Manager, could you send a [CANCELLED] message on this thread >> so that when looking back, the list archive makes it clear as to status? >> >> Andy >> > >
