Sure, I can fill some time with my proposal.[1]
Another thing that comes to my mind is Stephens proposal on "supplies
concept"[2]
And an interesting talk would be about the proposal "Removing ability for
plugins to dynamically inject dependencies"[3]. For most cases I can think
of a solution, however what to do with pom-less goals dependency:get?
This is probably more than enough for tomorrow.
Robert
[1] http://markmail.org/message/cmia5vylzh2lzp3t
[2] http://markmail.org/message/sx4slb2dwbvth7u6
[3] http://markmail.org/message/7f55pruyc6pt2hlw
Op Wed, 02 Jul 2014 16:34:46 +0200 schreef Jason van Zyl <ja...@takari.io>:
The hangout is the same time as last week:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/events/c5dc2fimb4mau0anec7i1nde500
I figure we'll just always schedule it even if few or no one shows up.
Just a standing meeting to discuss anything.
Robert, maybe you would like to talk about your lifecycle proposal? We
can also discuss anything else, the floor is open.
With holidays in Canada this week I haven't finished writing up the POM
Evolved proposal.
Thanks,
Jason
----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
http://twitter.com/takari_io
---------------------------------------------------------
First, the taking in of scattered particulars under one Idea,
so that everyone understands what is being talked about ... Second,
the separation of the Idea into parts, by dividing it at the joints,
as nature directs, not breaking any limb in half as a bad carver might.
-- Plato, Phaedrus (Notes on the Synthesis of Form by C. Alexander)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org