Many is the time I wonder where did that dependency come from?
I see the addition of a repositoryId attribute as an "essential feature" for 
aufgeregt sein auditing goal by maven-audit-plugin

Good Idea Robert!
+1

Martin 
_____


> To: dev@maven.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Maven Developer Hangout
> Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 18:56:58 +0200
> From: rfscho...@apache.org
> 
> In addition to our hangout session: isn't it weird that for a dependency  
> Maven can go over all the repositories, even though when an extra  
> repository is added to the pom.xml, the developer knows exactly which  
> dependencies should make use of that repository.
> 
> To me it would make sense if you could add a reference to the repository  
> per dependency, like
> 
> <dependency>
>    <groupId>com.acme</groupId>
>    <artifactId>specialtool</artifactId>
>    <version>1.0-alpha-1</version>
>    <repositoryId>acme-store</repositoryId> <!-- only look in this repo, I  
> know it's not in Central -->
> </dependency>
> 
> Robert
> 
> Op Thu, 03 Jul 2014 00:37:17 +0200 schreef Mark Derricutt  
> <m...@talios.com>:
> 
> > On 3 Jul 2014, at 6:25, Robert Scholte wrote:
> >
> >> This is probably more than enough for tomorrow.
> >
> > A discussion on a merits and flaws of <repositories> (when combined with  
> > mirrors) is also warranted after some previous discussion on the list.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> 
                                          

Reply via email to