> Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 18:31:35 -0500 > Subject: Re: Maven Developer Hangout > From: pbened...@apache.org > To: dev@maven.apache.org > > The use of <repositories> even with a symbolic id assumes there's only one > canonical location for the artifact. I don't think that's true and would > never want to be the end-user who has to manage those symbolic ids. I still > advocate removing this tag. I think it's the job of the intermediary (like > Nexus) to write some metadata on where it last found the artifact and then > only searching others upon failure retrieving a different version / update.
MG>Paul..Where would the discovered repository metadata be written?..distributionManagement? MG>Tamas ...is this possible? > > > Cheers, > Paul > > > On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Robert Scholte <rfscho...@apache.org> wrote: > > > I fully agree on the SHA1 check and the repo manager protocol, but as long > > as we need the <repositories/> in the pom.xml, the repositoryId can help to > > optimize the searchpath for the artifacts. > > > > That would make the pom responsible for mapping dependency to the original > > repositoryUrl and the repository manager for mapping the original > > repositoryUrl to the ultimate repositoryUrl. > > > > Or don't do it to encourage projects to push their artifacts to Maven > > Central. > > > > thanks, > > Robert > > > > Op Fri, 04 Jul 2014 19:08:16 +0200 schreef Jason van Zyl <ja...@takari.io > > >: > > > > If you consider the identity of the artifact to be its SHA1, > >> theoretically it doesn't matter where it comes from. This is not to say > >> that's optimal to go looking everywhere for an artifact. How this is > >> constrained in Nexus is through routing rules where Nexus knows only to > >> look for given groupIds in a particular repository and this great optimizes > >> lookup times. One might argue this type of logic can be moved back into > >> Maven itself. > >> > >> As we discussed in the hangout, and I agree with Igor, that mirrors were > >> an error and likely something we should eliminate in Maven 4.0.0 and work > >> on a repository manager protocol like we discussed. > >> > >> On Jul 4, 2014, at 12:56 PM, Robert Scholte <rfscho...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >> In addition to our hangout session: isn't it weird that for a dependency > >>> Maven can go over all the repositories, even though when an extra > >>> repository is added to the pom.xml, the developer knows exactly which > >>> dependencies should make use of that repository. > >>> > >>> To me it would make sense if you could add a reference to the repository > >>> per dependency, like > >>> > >>> <dependency> > >>> <groupId>com.acme</groupId> > >>> <artifactId>specialtool</artifactId> > >>> <version>1.0-alpha-1</version> > >>> <repositoryId>acme-store</repositoryId> <!-- only look in this repo, I > >>> know it's not in Central --> > >>> </dependency> > >>> > >>> Robert > >>> > >>> Op Thu, 03 Jul 2014 00:37:17 +0200 schreef Mark Derricutt < > >>> m...@talios.com>: > >>> > >>> On 3 Jul 2014, at 6:25, Robert Scholte wrote: > >>>> > >>>> This is probably more than enough for tomorrow. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> A discussion on a merits and flaws of <repositories> (when combined > >>>> with mirrors) is also warranted after some previous discussion on the > >>>> list. > >>>> > >>>> Mark > >>>> > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >>>> > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >>> > >>> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Jason > >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------- > >> Jason van Zyl > >> Founder, Apache Maven > >> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl > >> http://twitter.com/takari_io > >> --------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> Our achievements speak for themselves. What we have to keep track > >> of are our failures, discouragements and doubts. We tend to forget > >> the past difficulties, the many false starts, and the painful > >> groping. We see our past achievements as the end result of a > >> clean forward thrust, and our present difficulties as > >> signs of decline and decay. > >> > >> -- Eric Hoffer, Reflections on the Human Condition > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > >