+1 Good idea. I err on the side of expunging to reduce the foot print. If the person cares enough they will come back. There's a lot of gorp in JIRA.
On Nov 23, 2014, at 2:05 PM, Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi folks, > > this has been itching me for quite some time now. Once in a while, I check > our JIRA projects for open issues and try to evaluate them for fixability, > etc. While some reporters respond after a question, some never do. > > I'd like to propose to close a ticket as *Incomplete* when the reporter is > not responding to a question which is required to solve the issue. E.g., log > file, further information, sample project, reproduce with newest version, etc. > > We could squash out more than 100 bugs (not improvements) in JIRA with that. > It makes no sense having them around for ever. > > The target wait period should be *30 days* after a Maven developer requested > further information. While 30 days seem quite long for some of you, I think > this is a decent timeframe for those who are quite busy with other stuff. I > catch myself too often needing more than two weeks to answer with a qualified > statement to a JIRA ticket. > > What do you think? > > Michael > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > Thanks, Jason ---------------------------------------------------------- Jason van Zyl Founder, Apache Maven http://twitter.com/jvanzyl http://twitter.com/takari_io --------------------------------------------------------- A party which is not afraid of letting culture, business, and welfare go to ruin completely can be omnipotent for a while. -- Jakob Burckhardt
