Stephen Connolly wrote:
> Hmmm shower thinking now has me pondering if a custom DSL might be
> better... something close to human friendly JSON with exceptions for
> dependency declaration so that they are always specified as g:a:p:v:c:t
> with the optional p and c being empty, e.g. g:a::v::t

For me, human-friendly would mean "allows comments", which is something
that plain JSON doesn't have but XML has (and which I use a lot in my POMs).

Just something to think about.

Best wishes,

Andreas


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to