Stephen Connolly wrote: > Hmmm shower thinking now has me pondering if a custom DSL might be > better... something close to human friendly JSON with exceptions for > dependency declaration so that they are always specified as g:a:p:v:c:t > with the optional p and c being empty, e.g. g:a::v::t
For me, human-friendly would mean "allows comments", which is something that plain JSON doesn't have but XML has (and which I use a lot in my POMs). Just something to think about. Best wishes, Andreas
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
