Hi Enrico, Using "--add-modules java.se.ee" works fine:
*mvn install "-Djdk.home=e:\Program Files\Java\jdk9"------------------------------------------------------- T E S T S-------------------------------------------------------Concurrency config is parallel='none', perCoreThreadCount=false, threadCount=1, useUnlimitedThreads=falseRunning org.apache.maven.surefire.its.Java9FullApiITTests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 31.583 secRunning org.apache.maven.surefire.its.jiras.Surefire1265Java9ITTests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 4.905 secResults :Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0* On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 12:40 AM, Tibor Digana <tibor.dig...@googlemail.com> wrote: > I am going to run the build with > --add-modules java.se.ee > > If this will work for me then pls confirm that I can commit it to master. > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 11:18 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On mer 16 ago 2017, 08:19 Tibor Digana <tibor.dig...@googlemail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Still I do not understand what is the difference between *all_system* >> > and *java.se.ee >> > <http://java.se.ee>*. >> > Is it a bug that proprietary package *jdk.incubator.httpclient* is in >> the >> > warning? It looks like it wants to be exposed out of the jdk to our >> > application which is not legal but then why jdk allows. >> > >> >> I see your headache with this. >> Maybe we could add only java.se.ee and document how to change to >> all_system. >> I will check the actual difference for normal applications >> >> >> Cheers >> Enrico >> >> >> > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 8:06 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Il mer 16 ago 2017, 02:44 Tibor Digana <tibordig...@apache.org> ha >> > > scritto: >> > > >> > > > Hi Enrico, >> > > > >> > > > It does not appear on console output however it is stored as native >> > > std/out >> > > > in target/surefire-reports/2017-08-13T23-52-13_184.dumpstream >> > > > >> > > >> > > Yep, it is as I suspected. If we want ro get rid of it we have to only >> > add >> > > java.se.ee module >> > > >> > > >> > > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 5:51 PM, Enrico Olivelli [via Maven] < >> > > > ml+s40175n5912520...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Il dom 13 ago 2017, 17:31 Tibor Digana <[hidden email] >> > > > > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5912520&i=0>> ha >> > > > > scritto: >> > > > > >> > > > > > I found an issue. JDK printed this on std/out: >> > > > > > WARNING: Using incubator modules: jdk.incubator.httpclient >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > IMHO This is because we are importing all system modules. Maybe >> > > importing >> > > > > only java.se.ee would cover most of the cases. >> > > > > I did not notice the warning on test I have run today >> > > > > >> > > > > Enrico >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > It hapens after my test: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > import org.junit.Test; >> > > > > > >> > > > > > public class J9Test >> > > > > > { >> > > > > > @Test >> > > > > > public void testMiscellaneousAPI() throws >> java.sql.SQLException >> > > > > > { >> > > > > > System.out.println( "loaded class " + >> > > > > > java.sql.SQLException.class.getName() ); >> > > > > > System.out.println( "loaded class " + >> > > > > > javax.xml.ws.Holder.class.getName() ); >> > > > > > System.out.println( "loaded class " + >> > > > > > javax.xml.bind.JAXBException.class.getName() ); >> > > > > > System.out.println( "loaded class " + >> > > > > > org.omg.CORBA.BAD_INV_ORDER.class.getName() ); >> > > > > > System.out.println( "loaded class " + >> > > > > > javax.xml.xpath.XPath.class.getName() ); >> > > > > > System.out.println( "java.specification.version=" + >> > > > > > System.getProperty( "java.specification.version" ) ); >> > > > > > } >> > > > > > >> > > > > > @Test >> > > > > > public void test_corba_mod() throws >> org.omg.CORBA.BAD_INV_ORDER >> > > > > > { >> > > > > > } >> > > > > > } >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Tibor Digana <[hidden email] >> > > > > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5912520&i=1> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > But why to add it? It's a hack. I do not use module-info.java >> and >> > > so >> > > > > > there >> > > > > > > is no reason to break the backwards compatibility. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > This is no more about Maven. It is about entire Java world. >> > > > > > > If we in Maven do it then everybody has to. >> > > > > > > And I am sure that the voices says that Kotlin is better and >> > Scala >> > > is >> > > > > > > better would make sense. Why to help these attempts to >> happen? No >> > > > > reason! >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Gary Gregory <[hidden email] >> > > > > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5912520&i=2>> >> > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Is there a Maven way to add ALL-SYSTEM to everything? Using >> > plugin >> > > > > > >> specific >> > > > > > >> tags like below is going to be painful. >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> Gary >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> On Aug 13, 2017 07:30, "Tibor Digana" <[hidden email] >> > > > > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5912520&i=3>> wrote: >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > Hi @Enrico, >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > I am very unhappy with Java 9 status and very afraid. >> > > > > > >> > I do not like the style how Oracle has changed Java to >> Java 9 >> > > and >> > > > > > forced >> > > > > > >> > all the world to use additional effort to adapt to Oracle >> > > > > activities. >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > I am facing more unhappy Java development teams with Java >> 9 in >> > > the >> > > > > > >> future. >> > > > > > >> > For instance as I have tried to implement users wish in >> Maven >> > > > > Surefire >> > > > > > >> > project and invested my personal time and effort to adapt >> to >> > > > Oracle >> > > > > > >> > requirements, this still does not convince me to say that >> > Java 9 >> > > > is >> > > > > > >> ready >> > > > > > >> > to go. >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > This is my comment from Jira: >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > "This is not nice on Java 9 that they broke backwards >> > > > compatibility >> > > > > > and >> > > > > > >> > force the world to use the switch to use --add-modules >> > > ALL-SYSTEM >> > > > > > >> instead >> > > > > > >> > of providing all modules installed in JRE. For instance, >> small >> > > JRE >> > > > > > >> having >> > > > > > >> > {{java.base}} has advantage on embedded systems and the >> only >> > > > should >> > > > > be >> > > > > > >> > propagated. Big scope JRE should propagate all installed >> > > modules. >> > > > > > >> > But for me it does not make security sense and common >> sense to >> > > > > force >> > > > > > >> JRE to >> > > > > > >> > provide modules. It should be opposite and the >> admin/Jenkins >> > > > should >> > > > > > >> > configure big scope JRE with selected modules propagated to >> > Java >> > > > > > runtime >> > > > > > >> > applications. >> > > > > > >> > If this admin does not do that then all modules should be >> > > > available >> > > > > by >> > > > > > >> > default which is backwards compatibility for me and we do >> not >> > > have >> > > > > to >> > > > > > to >> > > > > > >> > implement these stupid tricks." >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > As far as we remember Java Security, the policies can be >> > > > > configured. >> > > > > > >> > I can imaging same paradigm in Jigsaw/Java 9 and then the >> > admin >> > > > who >> > > > > > has >> > > > > > >> > installed JDK or JRE would "switch off" some modules. But >> > > > opposite, >> > > > > > that >> > > > > > >> > means the script which starts Java app currently enables >> "all" >> > > > > modules >> > > > > > >> is >> > > > > > >> > against security and against the principle of modular >> system >> > > > > because >> > > > > > the >> > > > > > >> > modules do not make sense then. >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > What makes sense to me is to enable "all java/javax" >> modules >> > > > except >> > > > > > for >> > > > > > >> the >> > > > > > >> > "com.sun" proprietary ones by default. >> > > > > > >> > So yes enable them by default and please release specific >> JRE >> > > > > > >> installations >> > > > > > >> > with specific bunch of Java modules for specific use cases. >> > > > > > >> > This means those modules in that particular release are all >> > > > enabled >> > > > > by >> > > > > > >> > default if not configured otherwise by admin, e.g. Jenkins, >> > > > > operation >> > > > > > >> > staff, etc. (do NOT mean Sun packages - never visible). >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > Here it comes. The idea that we can install small 5MB/JRE >> on >> > > small >> > > > > > Linux >> > > > > > >> > device would be possible because Oracle would release such >> > tiny >> > > > JRE >> > > > > > >> using >> > > > > > >> > only "java.lang" and then another JRE installation using >> > > java.lang >> > > > > and >> > > > > > >> > java.utils, and later NIO and later "java.desktop", etc. >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > Then vendors of web browsers and Linux dist would be happy >> to >> > > > > > integrate >> > > > > > >> > small JRE into and use JavaFX. >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > But now it is not possible because the modules are >> basically >> > > > three: >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > java.base == 37MB >> > > > > > >> > java.desktop == 36MB >> > > > > > >> > java.xml ==20MB >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > All the other modules are pretty small but these three >> seen in >> > > > > > "src.zip" >> > > > > > >> > make the modular system unbalanced in size and nobody would >> > ever >> > > > > wish >> > > > > > to >> > > > > > >> > integrate them because they are still big. That means the >> > > problem >> > > > > that >> > > > > > >> > Oracle has with NIO implementation in com.sun package >> > propagated >> > > > to >> > > > > > >> > "java.util", nobody in the world care and nobody should see >> > as a >> > > > > > >> problem to >> > > > > > >> > split "java.base" much more. >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > If splitting "java.base" happened then not certified JVMs >> > > > developed >> > > > > at >> > > > > > >> > Universities would for instance implement only "java.lang" >> and >> > > > > embed >> > > > > > it >> > > > > > >> in >> > > > > > >> > to JVM and develop a new programming language on the top of >> > > Java. >> > > > > But >> > > > > > >> > implementing 10 packages in java.base is an effort again. >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > One more thing is regarding the size of the modules. >> > > > > > >> > You really did not help embedded systems and installations >> of >> > > > > > browsers. >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Enrico Olivelli <[hidden >> > email] >> > > > > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5912520&i=4> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > wrote: >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > I would like to share my current pom configuration which >> > lets >> > > me >> > > > > to >> > > > > > >> > > build and test java8 apps on latest and greatest jdk9 >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > This profile is activated when using jdk9. >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > This is based on a suggestion of Robert, its suggestion >> for >> > > the >> > > > > > >> > > javadoc plugin is working great with surefire too >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > <profile> >> > > > > > >> > > <id>jdk9</id> >> > > > > > >> > > <activation> >> > > > > > >> > > <jdk>[9,)</jdk> >> > > > > > >> > > </activation> >> > > > > > >> > > <build> >> > > > > > >> > > <plugins> >> > > > > > >> > > <plugin> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > <artifactId>maven-javadoc-plugin</artifactId> >> > > > > > >> > > <configuration> >> > > > > > >> > > <additionalparam>--add- >> modules >> > > > > > >> > > ALL-SYSTEM</additionalparam> >> > > > > > >> > > </configuration> >> > > > > > >> > > </plugin> >> > > > > > >> > > <plugin> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > <artifactId>maven-surefire-pl >> > > > > > >> ugin</artifactId> >> > > > > > >> > > <version>2.20</version> >> > > > > > >> > > <configuration> >> > > > > > >> > > <argLine>--add-modules >> > > > > > >> ALL-SYSTEM</argLine> >> > > > > > >> > > </configuration> >> > > > > > >> > > </plugin> >> > > > > > >> > > </plugins> >> > > > > > >> > > </build> >> > > > > > >> > > </profile> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > -- Enrico >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > 2017-04-24 19:08 GMT+02:00 Karl Heinz Marbaise <[hidden >> > email] >> > > > > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5912520&i=5>>: >> > > > > > >> > > > Hi, >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > yes I will do within this week... >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Kind regards >> > > > > > >> > > > Karl Heinz Marbaise >> > > > > > >> > > > On 23/04/17 21:37, Enrico Olivelli wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > >> Thank you Robert, >> > > > > > >> > > >> I saw that you have merged my patch. >> > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > >> Is there any plan to release the new version of the >> war >> > > > > plugin? >> > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > >> Enrico >> > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > >> Il gio 13 apr 2017, 12:21 Paul Hammant <[hidden email] >> > > > > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5912520&i=6>> ha >> > > > > > >> scritto: >> > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > >>>> >> > > > > > >> > > >>>> >> > > > > > >> > > >>>>> I don't see any activity either, so my idea is to >> > > replace >> > > > > > >> XStream, >> > > > > > >> > > see >> > > > > > >> > > >>>> >> > > > > > >> > > >>>> MWAR-397[1] >> > > > > > >> > > >>>> >> > > > > > >> > > >>> >> > > > > > >> > > >>> Just for the record, Jörg is working through the >> Java9 >> > > > issues >> > > > > > for >> > > > > > >> > > XStream >> > > > > > >> > > >>> presently - https://github.com/x-stream/ >> > > > > xstream/commits/master >> > > > > > >> > > >>> >> > > > > > >> > > >>> - Paul >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > ------------------------------ >> > > ------------------------------ >> > > > > > >> --------- >> > > > > > >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] >> > > > > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5912520&i=7> >> > > > > > >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] >> > > > > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5912520&i=8> >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ >> > > --------- >> > > > > > >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] >> > > > > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5912520&i=9> >> > > > > > >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] >> > > > > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5912520&i=10> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > -- >> > > > > > > Cheers >> > > > > > > Tibor >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > -- >> > > > > > Cheers >> > > > > > Tibor >> > > > > > >> > > > > -- >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > -- Enrico Olivelli >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > ------------------------------ >> > > > > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the >> > > discussion >> > > > > below: >> > > > > >> > > > http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Building-a-Java9-project- >> > > just-using-JDK9- >> > > > > tp5905517p5912520.html >> > > > > To start a new topic under Maven Developers, email >> > > > > ml+s40175n142166...@n5.nabble.com >> > > > > To unsubscribe from Maven Developers, click here >> > > > > < >> > > > http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp? >> > > macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=142166&code=dGlib3JkaWdhbmFAY >> XBhY2hlLm9yZ3 >> > > wxNDIxNjZ8LTI4OTQ5MjEwMg== >> > > > > >> > > > > . >> > > > > NAML >> > > > > < >> > > > http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp? >> > > macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml& >> > > base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view. >> > > web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template. >> > > NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble% >> > > 3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_ >> > > instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > View this message in context: >> > > > http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Building-a-Java9-project- >> > > just-using-JDK9-tp5905517p5912569.html >> > > > Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > >> > > -- >> > > >> > > >> > > -- Enrico Olivelli >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Cheers >> > Tibor >> > >> -- >> >> >> -- Enrico Olivelli >> > > > > -- > Cheers > Tibor > -- Cheers Tibor
