ok, let's switch directly to the Docker case I'm not a Docker expert, then I'm discovering things that my be obvious to others
IIUC Docker has an "officiel images" project [1] where Carlos provided a Maven image [2]: then this image is known as "the official Maven Docker image" Carlos is an individual, he's also a PMC member of Maven what do we want to say: the PMC member has provided an official Docker image or an individual has provided an official Docker image? depending on the answer, some way of doing has to be changed (Git location or naming of the official image) Regards, Hervé [1] https://github.com/docker-library/official-images [2] https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/blob/master/library/maven Le samedi 21 octobre 2017, 06:58:50 CEST Manfred Moser a écrit : > From my perspective it is just like sdkman including the conclusion. We have > other tasks at our hands, maintaining a docker images is not something we > should bother with. However needs one can easily create one and there will > be thousands of variations different users want. > > Let them create it on their own. > > Manfred > > Hervé BOUTEMY wrote on 2017-10-20 18:46: > > true, from a general perspective, it's like sdkman > > > > we need to discuss then decide if we want to maintain Maven Docker > > integration (contrary to our current decision to not maintain Maven > > sdkman integration but let sdkman community do it) > > > > can we think about a general solution? perhaps not really a solution, but > > a > > decision process, yes > > > > to me, on each tool integration, there are key decision drivers: > > - importance of the tool on the market > > - interest of Maven devs to actually do integration maintenance > > - complexity of integration, technical prerequisites (with IDEs, for > > example, a dedicated independant project like m2e is necessary) > > - time factor: things evolve over time (e.g. 2 years ago, Docker was not > > what it is nowadays) > > > > any other key driver to document? > > > > once done, we'll discuss more precisely about the Docker integration case > > > > and probably finish with a vote :) > > > > Regards, > > > > Hervé > > > > Le vendredi 20 octobre 2017, 11:30:49 CEST Robert Scholte a écrit : > >> Isn't this actually the same case as sdkman[1]? > >> Just wondering if we need to think about a general solution instead of > >> pulling everything into our project when possible. > >> > >> thanks, > >> Robert > >> > >> [1] http://markmail.org/message/oofvszmf56tbr7et > >> > >> On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 19:30:57 +0200, Hervé BOUTEMY <herve.bout...@free.fr> > >> > >> wrote: > >> > great idea > >> > > >> > ok, we need a git repo at ASF > >> > > >> > what else? > >> > Is there some sort of release process? some sort of source to release? > >> > > >> > Regards, > >> > > >> > Hervé > >> > > >> > Le jeudi 19 octobre 2017, 13:47:45 CEST Mike Drob a écrit : > >> >> Thanks for the pointer, Carlos! I had searched the archives, but maybe > >> >> I > >> >> didn't go back far enough. > >> >> > >> >> I think moving these Dockerfiles into an ASF repo would be great for > >> >> their > >> >> maintainability. > >> >> > >> >> Thanks, > >> >> > >> >> Mike > >> >> > >> >> On 2017-10-19 03:50, Carlos Sanchez <c...@apache.org> wrote: > >> >> > Arnaud is correct, I sent an email to users@ back on Fri, Nov 7, > >> >> > >> >> 2014,> > >> >> > >> >> > 00:23 when I created the image> > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017, 11:12 Arnaud H�ritier <ah...@gmail.com> > >> >> > wrote:> > >> >> > > >> >> > > These images are kindly managed by a PMC member of our project > >> >> > >> >> (Carlos) > >> >> > >> >> but> > >> >> > >> >> > > yes they aren't managed directly by the project> > >> >> > > > >> >> > > We can easily see with him to improve this IMO.> > >> >> > > > >> >> > > When he started that (several years ago) Docker wasn't what it is > >> >> > >> >> nowadays.> > >> >> > >> >> > > With docker being mainstream I agree that we can reconsider this.> > >> >> > > > >> >> > > The docker image build/distribution could perhaps be part of our > >> >> > >> >> release> > >> >> > >> >> > > process.> > >> >> > > > >> >> > > WDYT Carlos ?> > >> >> > > > >> >> > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Mike Drob <md...@apache.org> > >> >> > >> >> wrote:> > >> >> > >> >> > > > I guess the natural follow-on question is whether the Maven > >> >> > >> >> community> > >> >> > >> >> > > > would consider publishing an official set of images? Or > >> >> > >> >> alternatively> > >> >> > >> >> > > > whether they should send a takedown notice to protect their > >> >> > > > brand > >> >> > >> >> and> > >> >> > >> >> > > > trademarks...> > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > On 2017-10-18 18:36, "Manfred Moser" <ma...@simpligility.com> > >> >> > >> >> wrote:> > >> >> > >> >> > > > > No. As you can see from the github URL this is NOT an apache > >> >> > >> >> URL.> > >> >> > >> >> > > > > https://github.com/carlossg/docker-maven> > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > Mike Drob wrote on 2017-10-18 16:32:> > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hello,> > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Are the images at https://hub.docker.com/r/_/maven/ > >> >> > >> >> considered to > >> >> > >> >> be> > >> >> > >> >> > > > official> > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > maven docker images and blessed/published by the PMC?> > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Thanks,> > >> >> > > > > > Mike> > >> >> > >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------> > >> >> > >> >> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org> > >> >> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > >> >> > > > > > users-h...@maven.apache.org> > >> >> > >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------> > >> >> > >> >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org> > >> >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org> > >> >> > >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------> > >> >> > >> >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org> > >> >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org> > >> >> > > > >> >> > > --> > >> >> > > -----> > >> >> > > Arnaud H�ritier> > >> >> > > http://aheritier.net> > >> >> > > Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com> > >> >> > > Twitter/Skype : aheritier> > >> > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
