So i’d be
“The dockerfile has been released by the Maven project and a member of
the
PMC has uploaded the image”
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> [1] https://github.com/docker-library/official-images
>
> [2]
>
https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/blob/master/library/mave
> n
>
> Le samedi 21 octobre 2017, 06:58:50 CEST Manfred Moser a écrit :
> > From my perspective it is just like sdkman including the
conclusion. We
>
> have
>
> > other tasks at our hands, maintaining a docker images is not
something
> > we
> > should bother with. However needs one can easily create one and
there
>
> will
>
> > be thousands of variations different users want.
> >
> > Let them create it on their own.
> >
> > Manfred
> >
> > Hervé BOUTEMY wrote on 2017-10-20 18:46:
> > > true, from a general perspective, it's like sdkman
> > >
> > > we need to discuss then decide if we want to maintain Maven Docker
> > > integration (contrary to our current decision to not maintain
Maven
> > > sdkman integration but let sdkman community do it)
> > >
> > > can we think about a general solution? perhaps not really a
solution,
>
> but
>
> > > a
> > > decision process, yes
> > >
> > > to me, on each tool integration, there are key decision drivers:
> > > - importance of the tool on the market
> > > - interest of Maven devs to actually do integration maintenance
> > > - complexity of integration, technical prerequisites (with IDEs,
for
> > > example, a dedicated independant project like m2e is necessary)
> > > - time factor: things evolve over time (e.g. 2 years ago, Docker
was
>
> not
>
> > > what it is nowadays)
> > >
> > > any other key driver to document?
> > >
> > > once done, we'll discuss more precisely about the Docker
integration
>
> case
>
> > > and probably finish with a vote :)
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Hervé
> > >
> > > Le vendredi 20 octobre 2017, 11:30:49 CEST Robert Scholte a écrit
:
> > >> Isn't this actually the same case as sdkman[1]?
> > >> Just wondering if we need to think about a general solution
instead
> > >> of
> > >> pulling everything into our project when possible.
> > >>
> > >> thanks,
> > >> Robert
> > >>
> > >> [1] http://markmail.org/message/oofvszmf56tbr7et
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 19:30:57 +0200, Hervé BOUTEMY <
>
> herve.bout...@free.fr>
>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > great idea
> > >> >
> > >> > ok, we need a git repo at ASF
> > >> >
> > >> > what else?
> > >> > Is there some sort of release process? some sort of source to
>
> release?
>
> > >> > Regards,
> > >> >
> > >> > Hervé
> > >> >
> > >> > Le jeudi 19 octobre 2017, 13:47:45 CEST Mike Drob a écrit :
> > >> >> Thanks for the pointer, Carlos! I had searched the archives,
but
>
> maybe
>
> > >> >> I
> > >> >> didn't go back far enough.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I think moving these Dockerfiles into an ASF repo would be
great
>
> for
>
> > >> >> their
> > >> >> maintainability.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Thanks,
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Mike
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On 2017-10-19 03:50, Carlos Sanchez <c...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >> >> > Arnaud is correct, I sent an email to users@ back on Fri,
Nov 7,
> > >> >>
> > >> >> 2014,>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > 00:23 when I created the image>
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017, 11:12 Arnaud H�ritier
<ah...@gmail.com>
> > >> >> > wrote:>
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > > These images are kindly managed by a PMC member of our
project
> > >> >>
> > >> >> (Carlos)
> > >> >>
> > >> >> but>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > > yes they aren't managed directly by the project>
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > We can easily see with him to improve this IMO.>
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > When he started that (several years ago) Docker wasn't
what it
>
> is
>
> > >> >> nowadays.>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > > With docker being mainstream I agree that we can
reconsider
>
> this.>
>
> > >> >> > > The docker image build/distribution could perhaps be part
of
>
> our
>
> > >> >> release>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > > process.>
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > WDYT Carlos ?>
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Mike Drob
<md...@apache.org>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> wrote:>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > > > I guess the natural follow-on question is whether the
Maven
> > >> >>
> > >> >> community>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > > > would consider publishing an official set of images? Or
> > >> >>
> > >> >> alternatively>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > > > whether they should send a takedown notice to protect
their
> > >> >> > > > brand
> > >> >>
> > >> >> and>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > > > trademarks...>
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > > On 2017-10-18 18:36, "Manfred Moser"
<ma...@simpligility.com
> > >> >>
> > >> >> wrote:>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > > > > No. As you can see from the github URL this is NOT an
>
> apache
>
> > >> >> URL.>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > > > > https://github.com/carlossg/docker-maven>
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > > Mike Drob wrote on 2017-10-18 16:32:>
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > > > Hello,>
> > >> >> > > > > >
> > >> >> > > > > > Are the images at https://hub.docker.com/r/_/maven/
> > >> >>
> > >> >> considered to
> > >> >>
> > >> >> be>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > > > official>
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > > > > maven docker images and blessed/published by the
PMC?>
> > >> >> > > > > >
> > >> >> > > > > > Thanks,>
> > >> >> > > > > > Mike>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------->
>
> > >> >> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org>
>
> > >> >> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > >> >> > > > > > users-h...@maven.apache.org>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------->
>
> > >> >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
>
> > >> >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> users-h...@maven.apache.org>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------->
>
> > >> >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org>
> > >> >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
users-h...@maven.apache.org
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > -->
> > >> >> > > ----->
> > >> >> > > Arnaud H�ritier>
> > >> >> > > http://aheritier.net>
> > >> >> > > Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com>
> > >> >> > > Twitter/Skype : aheritier>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> > >>
> > >>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> > >
> > >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>
> --
Sent from my phone
