Please looking exec plugin comment. Any sample based on it will be irrelevant for your concern, you have all tech détails already
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://x.com/rmannibucau> | .NET Blog <https://dotnetbirdie.github.io/> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.github.io/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/en-us/product/java-ee-8-high-performance-9781788473064> Javaccino founder (Java/.NET service - contact via linkedin) Le jeu. 6 nov. 2025, 17:12, Vladimir Sitnikov <[email protected]> a écrit : > >your example still relies on your wrong assumption Vladimir > > You still keep saying "wrong assumption" without providing technical > justification. > > >first answer is still accurate > > Here's the first answer: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/18pfo7nl8t0kly7vxho9kv2jr3y3c0jl > > Here's the exact quite: > > >My 2cts are that transitive deps never set what you need in depMgt until > >scoped to their own groupid/ecosystem or when you get luck they release at > >the some time than cause do sounds like the promise of issues and need to > >manual overrides to me. > > Hey, Romain, it does not clarify why "clear reproducible test case is not > relevant" > It does not clarify how my proposal would "mess up consumers" > It does not clarify what is broken with my proposal. > > > you look on the wrong side > > I'm looking for support from the Maven community, and so far the experience > is far worse than I expected. > > Vladimir >
