On 18/09/2007, Max Bowsher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think the convention really only goes as far as having two different > names in order to allow @execute and [EMAIL PROTECTED] versions. > > "attached" makes sense for the assembly plugin, but for the dependency > plugin, the distinction is not to do with attached artifacts, so the > name is confusing. > > I think that "just-analyze" was a better name than "analyze-attached" - > I don't see any advantages in changing, and there is the disadvantage of > it being a compatibility break with any poms already using it.
Right.. :) It would be good to have a naming convention for these type of goals since it seems to be a common requirement. So the two types are: 1) standalone use 2) participating within the build lifecycle How about the normal goal name for (1) and a '-build' suffix for (2)? This would give us dependency:analyze and dependency:analyze-build. I think this is more intuitive than the 'just-' prefix version. We won't break compatibility with the previous release since JustAnalyze was introduced after 2.0-alpha-4. Cheers, Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
