On 18/09/2007, Paul Gier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think he meant analyze would become analyze-build because you are doing both > analyze and a build. And just-analyze would become analyze. > But that way it breaks what people are used to. I like Brian's suggestion > analyze-only, that seems intuitive and to fit with other mojo names.
Sorry, I meant the contrary :) dependency:analyze - executes test-compile phase - for use standalone dependency:analyze-build - executes in phase verify - for use in the build lifecycle It would be good to have a standard naming strategy for these type of goals. Are there are other examples people know of aside from the assembly plugin? Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]