IMHO I think a vote with the two positions clearly identified (perhaps with pros and cons for both if the pair of ye can agree on the pros and cons). (unless somebody else has a third position)
-Stephen. On Jan 30, 2008 12:56 PM, Mark Hobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 30/01/2008, Mark Hobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't think that linking this level of artifact resolution > > uncertainty to its source repository is a good idea. How version > > ranges are resolved should be completely deterministic and independent > > from where the artifact was actually downloaded from, otherwise we'll > > end up with no end of build reproducibility problems. > > In addition, the local repository would be exempt from these rules. > This would require manually deleting artifacts from the local repo to > ensure that certain versions weren't picked up; a maintenance > nightmare I'm sure you'll agree. > > How's best to proceed with resolving this issue? Would voting make > sense, or should the PMC lay down the intended direction? I'm not > sure whether this thread needs to get any longer.. :) > > Mark > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
