On 1-Mar-08, at 3:22 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
Actually, now I'm confused... looking at commits it's being re-
integrated into the trunk and branches (Which seems like a good
thing to me).
Is this release needed any more Milos? Should we just pull it out?
We should practice what we preach, in that no one else can retract
mistakes and it should stay and Milos release it again. I just told
someone on the repo-maintainers list they couldn't change or pull
mistakes.
- Brett
On 02/03/2008, at 10:17 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
It's a bit tricky. I suggest we vote on what got synced out. If for
any reason the release must be pulled it can be and the next one
will need to be version 1.0.1 or something.
I'l take a look today/tomorrow.
- Brett
On 02/03/2008, at 9:12 AM, Tomasz Pik wrote:
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Milos Kleint <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi,
Please vote on the maven-toolchain 1.0 artifact.
The background for the release:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-dev/200802.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Toolchains
Unfortately I've messed up and released the bits already. As
instructed by Wendy Smoak I've added gpg signatures. Please
double-check that everything is ok.
Repo:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/maven/maven-toolchain/1.0/
Hmm, doesn't this location means that vote may be considered as
'passed'
because this has been synced to main repo:
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/maven-toolchain/1.0/
Regards,
Tomek
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Jason
----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
----------------------------------------------------------
People develop abstractions by generalizing from concrete examples.
Every attempt to determine the correct abstraction on paper without
actually developing a running system is doomed to failure. No one
is that smart. A framework is a resuable design, so you develop it by
looking at the things it is supposed to be a design of. The more
examples
you look at, the more general your framework will be.
-- Ralph Johnson & Don Roberts, Patterns for Evolving Frameworks
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
