On Saturday 01 March 2008, Jason van Zyl wrote: > On 1-Mar-08, at 3:22 PM, Brett Porter wrote: > > Actually, now I'm confused... looking at commits it's being re- > > integrated into the trunk and branches (Which seems like a good > > thing to me). > > > > Is this release needed any more Milos? Should we just pull it out? > > We should practice what we preach, in that no one else can retract > mistakes and it should stay and Milos release it again. I just told > someone on the repo-maintainers list they couldn't change or pull > mistakes.
I personally think we need to allow mistakes to be pulled. However, they cannot re-release the same version. Basically, deletes, not updates. Not sure how to enforce that though. For example, if a jar or something gets a nasty virus/trojan in it. We would need to get it out of there. Dan > > > - Brett > > > > On 02/03/2008, at 10:17 AM, Brett Porter wrote: > >> It's a bit tricky. I suggest we vote on what got synced out. If for > >> any reason the release must be pulled it can be and the next one > >> will need to be version 1.0.1 or something. > >> > >> I'l take a look today/tomorrow. > >> > >> - Brett > >> > >> On 02/03/2008, at 9:12 AM, Tomasz Pik wrote: > >>> On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Milos Kleint <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> > >>> wrote: > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> Please vote on the maven-toolchain 1.0 artifact. > >>>> The background for the release: > >>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-dev/200802.mbox/%3 > >>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Toolchains > >>>> > >>>> Unfortately I've messed up and released the bits already. As > >>>> instructed by Wendy Smoak I've added gpg signatures. Please > >>>> double-check that everything is ok. > >>>> > >>>> Repo: > >>>> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apa > >>>>che/maven/maven-toolchain/1.0/ > >>> > >>> Hmm, doesn't this location means that vote may be considered as > >>> 'passed' > >>> because this has been synced to main repo: > >>> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/maven-toolchain/1.0 > >>>/ > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Tomek > >>> > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>>--- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> -- > >> Brett Porter > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > > Brett Porter > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > >- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Thanks, > > Jason > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Jason van Zyl > Founder, Apache Maven > jason at sonatype dot com > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > People develop abstractions by generalizing from concrete examples. > Every attempt to determine the correct abstraction on paper without > actually developing a running system is doomed to failure. No one > is that smart. A framework is a resuable design, so you develop it by > looking at the things it is supposed to be a design of. The more > examples > you look at, the more general your framework will be. > > -- Ralph Johnson & Don Roberts, Patterns for Evolving Frameworks > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- J. Daniel Kulp Principal Engineer, IONA [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dankulp.com/blog --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
