technically there is no git repo which is 'better' than the other. This hierarchy is an orga one.
If you can pull from my repo and from Jasons, from whom will you pull your master mainly? Bet you will pull from Jasons. And I also bet all contributors will try to get their changes being pulled by Jason and published in his repo at the end of the day. LieGrue, strub --- Robert Burrell Donkin <robertburrelldon...@gmail.com> schrieb am Do, 23.4.2009: > Von: Robert Burrell Donkin <robertburrelldon...@gmail.com> > Betreff: Re: Using GIT as the canonical repository for Maven 3.x > An: "Maven Developers List" <dev@maven.apache.org> > Datum: Donnerstag, 23. April 2009, 23:27 > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Mark > Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> > wrote: > > > > +1 for moving to git. > > > > Jukka already mirrors a lot of projets on GitHub and > there is already a git.apache.org domain too (not sure where > this leads too). > > > > Jason is already convinced, but for all other > sceptics: > > Basically the location of the repo is just wurscht! It > doesn't make any difference, since any repo is simply a > clone of each other. > > how is the code provenance control going to work using > GIT? > > - robert > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
