Brian, What ramifications could exist if .m2 is the fallback? It would be an easy upgrade path. My point is, it's odd Maven 3 has an "m2" user directory -- nothing technically incorrect; just a vestigial of progress.
Paul On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Brian Fox <bri...@infinity.nu> wrote: > This sounds easy on the maven side, but what are the ramifications for > all the tools that would have to be updated. Is it worth it? > > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> wrote: >> 3.0-beta-1 being a beta release, it's getting close to GA. I was >> wondering can MNG-4483 be addressed? I don't think Maven can keep the >> .m2 user directory exclusively -- it could be a good fallback for >> compatibility -- but it should be looking for .m3 or .mvn. >> >> Paul >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
