Just to play devil's advocate, if you run maven then sync your tool, maven
will use .mvn, the IDE/tool will only check .m2.
[]s Gus
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> wrote:
> Brian,
>
> What ramifications could exist if .m2 is the fallback? It would be an
> easy upgrade path. My point is, it's odd Maven 3 has an "m2" user
> directory -- nothing technically incorrect; just a vestigial of
> progress.
>
> Paul
>
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Brian Fox <bri...@infinity.nu> wrote:
> > This sounds easy on the maven side, but what are the ramifications for
> > all the tools that would have to be updated. Is it worth it?
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> 3.0-beta-1 being a beta release, it's getting close to GA. I was
> >> wondering can MNG-4483 be addressed? I don't think Maven can keep the
> >> .m2 user directory exclusively -- it could be a good fallback for
> >> compatibility -- but it should be looking for .m3 or .mvn.
> >>
> >> Paul
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>
>
