On Apr 26, 2010, at 11:43 AM, Paul Benedict wrote: > Could this be slated for beta-2? And if it is decided to be not the > right time, bump it to 3.1? >
I think we should focus on fixing issues for 3.0, but that doesn't mean we can't start thinking and making prototypes for other features. > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 3:19 AM, Benjamin Bentmann > <benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu> wrote: >> Brett Porter wrote: >> >>> However, it is important to be able to change the settings.xml file in >>> future, and the best way to do that and still support Maven 2 is by having a >>> second location. Is Maven 3 already forwards compatible with reading the >>> settings file? If not yet, I wouldn't consider this change until it is. >>> Maybe this is a 3.1 thing. >> >> As per MNG-4390, unknown elements cause warnings but don't fail the build, >> thereby easing side-by-side use of different Maven versions. >> >> >> Benjamin >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > Thanks, Jason ---------------------------------------------------------- Jason van Zyl Founder, Apache Maven http://twitter.com/jvanzyl ----------------------------------------------------------
