On Jan 24, 2011, at 9:16 PM, Brett Porter wrote: > > On 23/01/2011, at 4:34 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > >> From what I can tell Sisu was previously under the Apache license but now >> also seems to have the EPL attached to it. Until the PMC makes a decision on >> how it is going to handle dependencies being managed by Sonatype I must veto >> any version changes on these artifacts. Please revert this change. > > So, normally a veto is worked through until consensus is reached rather than > just dropping the change. It's a harsh step, but only applies to a single > change and not a block on all changes. There's no need for overreactions, > let's just try and resolve it. > > Is the only way to move forward to determine how to handle third-party > dependencies, and how to apply it to current ones? Or is there another > suggestion someone would like to make? > > - Brett
All I asked for was for the PMC to define a policy - any policy - and then I'd remove the veto. Even a policy of "we don't care as long as it meets licensing requirements" would suffice. I am just requesting that the PMC formally state what it wants to do for the record. Ralph --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
