okay I have a candidate implementation based on the initial plugin on google
code.

Can someone with Jira admin right create the maven project for the plugin
please?
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPA-116

Thanks,
Stéphane

On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Kristian Rosenvold <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Sorry, my misunderstanding.
>
> Looks good to me ;)
>
> Kristian
>
>
>
> lø., 19.03.2011 kl. 09.51 +0100, skrev Stephane Nicoll:
> > What other code are you talking about? The plugin on google code? The
> idea
> > here is to deprecate it in favor of this "official" maven plugin
> >
> > S.
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Kristian Rosenvold <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Just out of curiosity, how does this code relate to the other code that
> > > does similar stuff? Is it a copy paste fork?
> > >
> > > Kristian
> > >
> > > lø., 19.03.2011 kl. 09.42 +0100, skrev Olivier Lamy:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > No problem for me if you want to add this new packaging support and
> > > > add in maven core.
> > > >
> > > > acr ?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Olivier
> > > >
> > > > 2011/3/19 Stephane Nicoll <[email protected]>:
> > > > > No Maven committers/PMCs replied to this.
> > > > >
> > > > > Any insight?
> > > > >
> > > > > S.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Stephane Nicoll
> > > > > <[email protected]>wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hi,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I am currently working on supporting the "application-client"
> artifact
> > > > >> type properly in the EAR plugin. Pablo (in CC) wrote a
> > > > >> maven-car-plugin[1] which is very similar to the EJB plugin but
> for
> > > > >> application-client type. Do we think it would be reasonable to add
> > > > >> this plugin to the portfolio of standard plugins? (if Pablo
> accepts to
> > > > >> contribute it to the ASF but I don't think it would be an issue).
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I am bit puzzled about the type 'car' since car is already used by
> > > > >> Geronimo for their deployment plans;
> <type>application-client</type>
> > > > >> would better fit I'd say (with a .jar extension)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The problems I am having is that since we don't have an "official"
> > > > >> maven type for that thing and nothing to build it with Maven, I
> can't
> > > > >> detect these artifacts other than scanning every single jar file
> added
> > > > >> to a project to see if there is a META-INF/application-client.xml
> > > > >> file. Frankly, I am not going to implement a feature that will
> scan
> > > > >> every single jar file before building an EAR
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The plugin needs a bit of cleanup (namely the jEE version check)
> and I
> > > > >> don't know if the community uses this a lot but we don't cover the
> > > > >> whole spectrum of the JavaEE spec and it wouldn't cost us much to
> do
> > > > >> it.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Can someone remind me how these "official" types gets added and
> > > > >> detected by Maven? Do we absolutely need to touch the core type
> > > > >> definition files or is there another way?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Please let me know what you think.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > >> S.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> [1] http://code.google.com/p/maven-car-plugin
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to