On 12/1/11 3:28 PM, John Casey wrote:
On 12/1/11 3:25 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
It seems to me that one of the major values of an 'RC' discipline is
that it's uniquely tagged and bagged we can tell which bugs where
found or fixed in which RC.
This in turn could argue for a scheme in which we vote and release
'milestone' releases: available for general testing, protected by the
Foundation's umbrella, but officially not fully stable.
Based on long experience answering questions and criticism about this
project, I've learned to be a little more cautious about calling
something ready without having feedback from users.
It's just my opinion, but it seems like soliciting feedback only after
calling something released is a little back-to-front.
Okay, okay. :-)
I agree that given a long enough vote time limit, and the assumption
that you won't pursue feedback for the RC on us...@...and the idea that
we don't really care which RC fixed this or that bug.
Given all that, this thread is effectively the same as doing an RC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
--
John Casey
Developer, PMC Chair - Apache Maven (http://maven.apache.org)
Blog: http://www.johnofalltrades.name/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
