Hi guys
Here's an attempt to summarize this discussion and also add some of my
personal preference. This is how I want the directory structure, which
matches the inheritance structure, to be
doxia
+-- doxia-base (was doxia)
+-- doxia-core
+-- doxia-logging-api
+-- doxia-modules
+-- doxia-sink-api
+-- doxia-test-docs (stays here for now)
+-- doxia-sitetools
+-- doxia-decoration-model
+-- doxia-doc-renderer
+-- doxia-integration-tools (was shared/maven-doxia-tools)
+-- doxia-linkcheck (moved here from doxia-tools)
+-- doxia-site-renderer
+-- doxia-book-renderer (was doxia/doxia-book)
+-- doxia-book-maven-plugin (was doxia/doxia-maven-plugin)
+-- doxia-converter (moved here from doxia-tools)
+-- doxia-ide
a. Rebrand "Doxia" to "Doxia base" to differentiate it from Doxia - the
umbrella. We do not change the groupId.
b. doxia-test-docs stays where it is for now, until someone has the time
to look at it
c. shared/maven-doxia-tools moves to
doxia-sitetools/doxia-integration-tools. We should change the artifactId
and groupId now, because the current version of shared/maven-doxia-tools
is 1.4, but the new one will be 1.3.
d. In order to completely remove the psuedo-umbrella project doxia-tools
we move doxia-converter to the root and doxia-linkcheck to
doxia-sitetools. Another alternative is to move doxia-linkcheck to root.
e. doxia-book and doxia-maven-plugin work together, but should be
allowed to have independent release cycles, so they both move from doxia
to the root.
I also suggest changing their names to better reflect what they do.
doxia-book therefor becomes doxia-book-renderer and doxia-maven-plugin
becomes doxia-book-maven-plugin. This change should include changing the
artifactId for both of them.
Do we agree on this?
On 2012-03-31 08:55, Lukas Theussl wrote:
>
>
> Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
>> Le samedi 31 mars 2012 08:24:50 Lukas Theussl a écrit :
>>> The other way round was it? doxia-book into Doxia Tools and
>>> doxia-maven-plugin into Sitetools.
>>>
>>> -Lukas
>> no, Tools can depend on Sitetools, but not the other way
>
> Right, didn't think about the dependencies. I'd move both to Tools then,
> that way they can have independent releases from doxia/sitetools.
>
> -Lukas
>
>
>>
>> the other ways would be do move both modules to Tools or Sitetools
>> but not doxia-book to Tools and doxia-maven-plugin to Sitetools
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Hervé
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>
--
Dennis Lundberg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
