Which is what I thought.

+1 to off by default then.

Sent from my iPhone

On 08/12/2012, at 9:11 PM, Arnaud Héritier <aherit...@gmail.com> wrote:

> http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ANSI_escape_code
> 
> It adds some extras character that you'll see if the console doesn't
> support it
> 
> ---------
> Arnaud
> 
> Le 8 déc. 2012 à 11:03, Chris Graham <chrisgw...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> 
> I'd like to know how it is implemented and what happens when it is run on a
> terminal that does not support it.
> 
> -Chris
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On 08/12/2012, at 8:54 AM, Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> +1 from me
> 
> 
> On Friday, 7 December 2012, Jesse McConnell wrote:
> 
> 
> I sure hope colored logging is off by default, I hate it :)
> 
> 
> --
> 
> jesse mcconnell
> 
> jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com <javascript:;>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Stephen Connolly <
> 
> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> I am -1 on coloured logger in 3.1.0 though given the number of commits to
> 
> core coming from me I am fine to state this is not a veto rather a very
> 
> strong preference.
> 
> 
> I am fine with proofing the coloured logger changes before releasing
> 
> 3.1.0
> 
> to ensure that we have logging right but in my view user visible changes
> 
> make API changes more solid so I am less keen to couple them.
> 
> 
> The logging changes are big enough for a separate release. I think users
> 
> will thank us for being cautious before putting coloured logging on top
> 
> 
> My €0.02
> 
> 
> - Stephen
> 
> 
> On Friday, 7 December 2012, Robert Scholte wrote:
> 
> 
> It's not about rush, it is about touching the Logging Framework while
> 
> for
> 
> the majority of the end-users it won't make that much of a difference.
> 
> I'm thinking what would make it interesting for me as an end-user to
> 
> use
> 
> this next release (apart from the bugfixes). We could already log and
> 
> control the logging-level. Now colors would make it more interesting,
> 
> even
> 
> if we could provide it as an extension (not part of core), as long as
> 
> it
> 
> works.
> 
> Sure, for the specialists these changes offer new opportunities, but
> 
> that's a small group.
> 
> 
> Robert
> 
> 
> Op Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:18:50 +0100 schreef Jason van Zyl <
> 
> ja...@tesla.io
> 
> :
> 
> 
> 
> On Dec 7, 2012, at 12:15 PM, Robert Scholte <rfscho...@apache.org>
> 
> wrote:
> 
> 
> If 3.1.0 is going to be the "New Logger"-release, I'd prefer to
> 
> include
> 
> the colored logger as well.
> 
> 
> 
> I'm not putting it in the release because I'm not, without discussion
> 
> 
> 1) Putting 3 logging implementations into the distribution
> 
> 
> or
> 
> 
> 2) Putting an immature logging implementation as the default
> 
> 
> Not something to be taken lightly and it's been 11 months at this point
> 
> so
> 
> what's the rush?
> 
> 
> That would make it more complete. Also, if coloring would require
> 
> extra
> 
> adjustments to the logging framework then now is the time. (it seems to
> 
> work out of the box, but we have to be sure.)
> 
> 
> 
> Robert
> 
> 
> 
> Op Fri, 07 Dec 2012 15:04:13 +0100 schreef Benson Margulies <
> 
> bimargul...@gmail.com>:
> 
> 
> As I see it, the vote bogged down because Kristian found problems, and
> 
> I haven't seen clear evidence that those problems are sorted out. I'd
> 
> be happy to vote +1 with respect to all the design questions for the
> 
> release 'as is'.
> 
> 
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
> 
> wrote:
> 
> 
> good idea, Benson.
> 
> 
> Btw, this VOTE did not get enough +1 in more than a week. And this is
> 
> not
> 
> because not enough people took care if you look at the plenty of
> 
> comments
> 
> in the thread.
> 
> 
> 1.) Do people have any technical comment on my proposal to introduce a
> 
> new
> 
> plugin-plugin flag for exposing slf4j? Is there any technical problem
> 
> with
> 
> that?
> 
> 
> Are there other proposals which might help increasing backward
> 
> compatibility?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 2.) what about the coloured logger with log4j2? I tried it locally and
> 
> it
> 
> worked great. What is the status? (Sorry if I missed something)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> LieGrue,
> 
> strub
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> 
> 
> From: Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com>
> 
> To: Maven Developers List <
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Reply via email to