Seriously this sounds like something you'd want to configure i. MAVEN_OPTS, so I'd be inclined to do color by default in 2012, soon 2013.
K Den 8. des. 2012 kl. 11:14 skrev Chris Graham <chrisgw...@gmail.com>: > Which is what I thought. > > +1 to off by default then. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 08/12/2012, at 9:11 PM, Arnaud Héritier <aherit...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ANSI_escape_code >> >> It adds some extras character that you'll see if the console doesn't >> support it >> >> --------- >> Arnaud >> >> Le 8 déc. 2012 à 11:03, Chris Graham <chrisgw...@gmail.com> a écrit : >> >> I'd like to know how it is implemented and what happens when it is run on a >> terminal that does not support it. >> >> -Chris >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 08/12/2012, at 8:54 AM, Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> +1 from me >> >> >> On Friday, 7 December 2012, Jesse McConnell wrote: >> >> >> I sure hope colored logging is off by default, I hate it :) >> >> >> -- >> >> jesse mcconnell >> >> jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com <javascript:;> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Stephen Connolly < >> >> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> I am -1 on coloured logger in 3.1.0 though given the number of commits to >> >> core coming from me I am fine to state this is not a veto rather a very >> >> strong preference. >> >> >> I am fine with proofing the coloured logger changes before releasing >> >> 3.1.0 >> >> to ensure that we have logging right but in my view user visible changes >> >> make API changes more solid so I am less keen to couple them. >> >> >> The logging changes are big enough for a separate release. I think users >> >> will thank us for being cautious before putting coloured logging on top >> >> >> My €0.02 >> >> >> - Stephen >> >> >> On Friday, 7 December 2012, Robert Scholte wrote: >> >> >> It's not about rush, it is about touching the Logging Framework while >> >> for >> >> the majority of the end-users it won't make that much of a difference. >> >> I'm thinking what would make it interesting for me as an end-user to >> >> use >> >> this next release (apart from the bugfixes). We could already log and >> >> control the logging-level. Now colors would make it more interesting, >> >> even >> >> if we could provide it as an extension (not part of core), as long as >> >> it >> >> works. >> >> Sure, for the specialists these changes offer new opportunities, but >> >> that's a small group. >> >> >> Robert >> >> >> Op Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:18:50 +0100 schreef Jason van Zyl < >> >> ja...@tesla.io >> >> : >> >> >> >> On Dec 7, 2012, at 12:15 PM, Robert Scholte <rfscho...@apache.org> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> If 3.1.0 is going to be the "New Logger"-release, I'd prefer to >> >> include >> >> the colored logger as well. >> >> >> >> I'm not putting it in the release because I'm not, without discussion >> >> >> 1) Putting 3 logging implementations into the distribution >> >> >> or >> >> >> 2) Putting an immature logging implementation as the default >> >> >> Not something to be taken lightly and it's been 11 months at this point >> >> so >> >> what's the rush? >> >> >> That would make it more complete. Also, if coloring would require >> >> extra >> >> adjustments to the logging framework then now is the time. (it seems to >> >> work out of the box, but we have to be sure.) >> >> >> >> Robert >> >> >> >> Op Fri, 07 Dec 2012 15:04:13 +0100 schreef Benson Margulies < >> >> bimargul...@gmail.com>: >> >> >> As I see it, the vote bogged down because Kristian found problems, and >> >> I haven't seen clear evidence that those problems are sorted out. I'd >> >> be happy to vote +1 with respect to all the design questions for the >> >> release 'as is'. >> >> >> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> good idea, Benson. >> >> >> Btw, this VOTE did not get enough +1 in more than a week. And this is >> >> not >> >> because not enough people took care if you look at the plenty of >> >> comments >> >> in the thread. >> >> >> 1.) Do people have any technical comment on my proposal to introduce a >> >> new >> >> plugin-plugin flag for exposing slf4j? Is there any technical problem >> >> with >> >> that? >> >> >> Are there other proposals which might help increasing backward >> >> compatibility? >> >> >> >> >> 2.) what about the coloured logger with log4j2? I tried it locally and >> >> it >> >> worked great. What is the status? (Sorry if I missed something) >> >> >> >> >> LieGrue, >> >> strub >> >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> >> >> From: Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> >> >> To: Maven Developers List < >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
