I fear meeting the millitant arch-Linux users running in strict C64 emulation. Maybe just enable colour by defalt for all fruity computers ?
K Den 8. des. 2012 kl. 13:10 skrev "Arnaud Héritier" <aherit...@gmail.com>: > And windows which has a support near to the Amiga ;) > > --------- > Arnaud > > Le 8 déc. 2012 à 12:55, Kristian Rosenvold > <kristian.rosenv...@zenior.no> a écrit : > >> Disable color by default in batch mode then. I suppose we could detect >> is users are running AmigaOS or aix and disable by default there too. >> >> Kristian >> >> Den 8. des. 2012 kl. 12:34 skrev Chris Graham <chrisgw...@gmail.com>: >> >>> AIX still does not do well with ANSI style colour. >>> >>> And I wonder how Jenkins would cope parsing the output. >>> >>> Seriously 2013 soon or not, don't break the output and introduce crap into >>> the output stream. >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On 08/12/2012, at 10:14 PM, Kristian Rosenvold >>> <kristian.rosenv...@zenior.no> wrote: >>> >>>> Seriously this sounds like something you'd want to configure i. >>>> MAVEN_OPTS, so I'd be inclined to do color by default in 2012, soon >>>> 2013. >>>> >>>> K >>>> >>>> Den 8. des. 2012 kl. 11:14 skrev Chris Graham <chrisgw...@gmail.com>: >>>> >>>>> Which is what I thought. >>>>> >>>>> +1 to off by default then. >>>>> >>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>> >>>>> On 08/12/2012, at 9:11 PM, Arnaud Héritier <aherit...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ANSI_escape_code >>>>>> >>>>>> It adds some extras character that you'll see if the console doesn't >>>>>> support it >>>>>> >>>>>> --------- >>>>>> Arnaud >>>>>> >>>>>> Le 8 déc. 2012 à 11:03, Chris Graham <chrisgw...@gmail.com> a écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd like to know how it is implemented and what happens when it is run >>>>>> on a >>>>>> terminal that does not support it. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Chris >>>>>> >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>> >>>>>> On 08/12/2012, at 8:54 AM, Stephen Connolly >>>>>> <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 from me >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Friday, 7 December 2012, Jesse McConnell wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I sure hope colored logging is off by default, I hate it :) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> jesse mcconnell >>>>>> >>>>>> jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com <javascript:;> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Stephen Connolly < >>>>>> >>>>>> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I am -1 on coloured logger in 3.1.0 though given the number of commits to >>>>>> >>>>>> core coming from me I am fine to state this is not a veto rather a very >>>>>> >>>>>> strong preference. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I am fine with proofing the coloured logger changes before releasing >>>>>> >>>>>> 3.1.0 >>>>>> >>>>>> to ensure that we have logging right but in my view user visible changes >>>>>> >>>>>> make API changes more solid so I am less keen to couple them. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The logging changes are big enough for a separate release. I think users >>>>>> >>>>>> will thank us for being cautious before putting coloured logging on top >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> My €0.02 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> - Stephen >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Friday, 7 December 2012, Robert Scholte wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> It's not about rush, it is about touching the Logging Framework while >>>>>> >>>>>> for >>>>>> >>>>>> the majority of the end-users it won't make that much of a difference. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm thinking what would make it interesting for me as an end-user to >>>>>> >>>>>> use >>>>>> >>>>>> this next release (apart from the bugfixes). We could already log and >>>>>> >>>>>> control the logging-level. Now colors would make it more interesting, >>>>>> >>>>>> even >>>>>> >>>>>> if we could provide it as an extension (not part of core), as long as >>>>>> >>>>>> it >>>>>> >>>>>> works. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sure, for the specialists these changes offer new opportunities, but >>>>>> >>>>>> that's a small group. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Robert >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Op Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:18:50 +0100 schreef Jason van Zyl < >>>>>> >>>>>> ja...@tesla.io >>>>>> >>>>>> : >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Dec 7, 2012, at 12:15 PM, Robert Scholte <rfscho...@apache.org> >>>>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> If 3.1.0 is going to be the "New Logger"-release, I'd prefer to >>>>>> >>>>>> include >>>>>> >>>>>> the colored logger as well. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm not putting it in the release because I'm not, without discussion >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 1) Putting 3 logging implementations into the distribution >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> or >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2) Putting an immature logging implementation as the default >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Not something to be taken lightly and it's been 11 months at this point >>>>>> >>>>>> so >>>>>> >>>>>> what's the rush? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> That would make it more complete. Also, if coloring would require >>>>>> >>>>>> extra >>>>>> >>>>>> adjustments to the logging framework then now is the time. (it seems to >>>>>> >>>>>> work out of the box, but we have to be sure.) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Robert >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Op Fri, 07 Dec 2012 15:04:13 +0100 schreef Benson Margulies < >>>>>> >>>>>> bimargul...@gmail.com>: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> As I see it, the vote bogged down because Kristian found problems, and >>>>>> >>>>>> I haven't seen clear evidence that those problems are sorted out. I'd >>>>>> >>>>>> be happy to vote +1 with respect to all the design questions for the >>>>>> >>>>>> release 'as is'. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> >>>>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> good idea, Benson. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Btw, this VOTE did not get enough +1 in more than a week. And this is >>>>>> >>>>>> not >>>>>> >>>>>> because not enough people took care if you look at the plenty of >>>>>> >>>>>> comments >>>>>> >>>>>> in the thread. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 1.) Do people have any technical comment on my proposal to introduce a >>>>>> >>>>>> new >>>>>> >>>>>> plugin-plugin flag for exposing slf4j? Is there any technical problem >>>>>> >>>>>> with >>>>>> >>>>>> that? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Are there other proposals which might help increasing backward >>>>>> >>>>>> compatibility? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2.) what about the coloured logger with log4j2? I tried it locally and >>>>>> >>>>>> it >>>>>> >>>>>> worked great. What is the status? (Sorry if I missed something) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> LieGrue, >>>>>> >>>>>> strub >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> From: Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> >>>>>> >>>>>> To: Maven Developers List < >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
