On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:

> There were method signature changes as well, so its not just a package
> rename IIRC
>

Ok that explains it
I remember there were some threads about it but I didn't read all of them.




>
>
> On 29 May 2013 08:57, Jörg Schaible <joerg.schai...@scalaris.com> wrote:
>
> > Arnaud Héritier wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY
> > > <herve.bout...@free.fr>wrote:
> > >
> > >> good idea: can you open a Jira issue?
> > >>
> > >
> > > Done :  https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5482
> > > Another probably more stupid idea : Wasn't it possible to use the shade
> > > plugin or something like this to provide a version of aether under the
> > old
> > > groupId to not have such requirement in plugins upgrades ? Something
> that
> > > we'll have been able to remove in a next major release (4)
> >
> > Weird idea: A ClassLoader that exchanges the package name automatically,
> > along with a fat deprecation warning?
> >
> > - Jörg
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> >
> >
>



-- 
-----
Arnaud Héritier
http://aheritier.net
Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com
Twitter/Skype : aheritier

Reply via email to