What do you mean exactly? Also what about the releasability question?
On Aug 20, 2013, at 7:45 AM, Dennis Lundberg <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for looking into this Jason. > > As someone who has tried to fix these builds, I think what we need is a > platform independent way to set up and run the core ITs. The best choice is > probably to use Ant. > Den 20 aug 2013 16:18 skrev "Jason van Zyl" <[email protected]>: > >> I have separated them like the following to delineate the stable builds >> that are a reliable measure of the ITs working and things that have either >> been failing for months, or things we can't reasonably maintain. >> >> If these are working I consider Maven releasable: >> >> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven%20Core%20ITs/ >> >> I put the rest of them here: >> >> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven%20Core%20ITs%20(unstable)/ >> >> If the jobs in the first group are passing can we consider that being in a >> reasonable state for a release? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jason >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------- >> Jason van Zyl >> Founder, Apache Maven >> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks, Jason ---------------------------------------------------------- Jason van Zyl Founder, Apache Maven http://twitter.com/jvanzyl --------------------------------------------------------- We know what we are, but know not what we may be. -- Shakespeare
