+1 here.

On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Anders Hammar <and...@hammar.net> wrote:
> +1 on clean up if we communicate this (and explain why).
> 0 on move
>
> /Anders
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Dominik Bartholdi <d...@fortysix.ch> wrote:
>
>> +1 cleanup is a really good idea!
>>
>> On 20.01.2014, at 18:50, Arnaud Héritier <aherit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > +1 with a jira cleanup (but documented and announced to users to let them
>> > understand what we do and why)
>> > +1 to move to ASF
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Jason van Zyl <ja...@takari.io> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Works for me to just start over on the ASF JIRA. There are a couple
>> issues
>> >> I'd move but we can migrate a issues easily. What can't continue is the
>> >> complete, incomprehensible mess that is there now.
>> >>
>> >> On Jan 20, 2014, at 12:32 PM, Stephen Connolly <
>> >> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> If we are going wholesale dumping issues (and I am not against that), I
>> >>> have a more radical suggestion... let's just move core to the ASF
>> JIRA...
>> >>> with next to no issues needing migration it would be easy ;-)
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On 20 January 2014 17:23, Jason van Zyl <ja...@takari.io> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Really, it's more about dropping a nuclear bomb on JIRA. While trying
>> to
>> >>>> sift through it this weekend it's clear to me it's less than ideal in
>> >> there.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> There are issues that are 12 years old and while there might be some
>> >>>> useful information in there that we hand select, I think anything that
>> >> is
>> >>>> older than 5 years we should just close as incomplete because with the
>> >>>> great deal of change that's happened with 3.x most of it isn't
>> relevant
>> >> and
>> >>>> if it is, and someone cares that much then it can be reopened with a
>> >>>> stand-alone working example of the problem.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Now, as to the requirements for a stand-alone working example I think
>> we
>> >>>> should enforce this because personally I'm not going to check out
>> >> someone's
>> >>>> project, figure out how to interpret it in relation to the actual
>> >> problem
>> >>>> in Maven and then create a project I can turn into an IT. I'm just not
>> >>>> going to do it generally. There might be exceptions but I don't want
>> to
>> >>>> read a textual examples or try to figure out snippets of a production
>> >>>> project that can't be shared. In m2e we require a working example
>> >> project
>> >>>> to even look at a problem and if the issue sits there for a year with
>> a
>> >>>> working sample project we close it.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Having an issue tracking system with 700 open issues is useless, so I
>> >>>> would like to do a mass purge. It shouldn't really get beyond 50 open
>> >>>> issues or it's just impossible to manage effectively.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Not sure what anyone else thinks but our JIRA situation is just not
>> >>>> effective. I'm thinking anything over 5 years old that isn't assigned
>> >> to a
>> >>>> core developer we just close as incomplete and then see what we're
>> left
>> >>>> with. If anyone complains then we point them at doco (I'll write it)
>> >> about
>> >>>> creating a stand-alone project because otherwise it become
>> impossible. I
>> >>>> spent 8 hours over the weekend looking at issues trying to interpret
>> >> what
>> >>>> someone was trying to say and I don't want to guess. If the user cares
>> >>>> enough they can make an example project.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thanks,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Jason
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>> Jason van Zyl
>> >>>> Founder,  Apache Maven
>> >>>> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>>
>> >>>> happiness is like a butterfly: the more you chase it, the more it will
>> >>>> elude you, but if you turn your attention to other things, it will
>> come
>> >>>> and sit softly on your shoulder ...
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -- Thoreau
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >>
>> >> Jason
>> >>
>> >> ----------------------------------------------------------
>> >> Jason van Zyl
>> >> Founder,  Apache Maven
>> >> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------
>> >>
>> >> believe nothing, no matter where you read it,
>> >> or who has said it,
>> >> not even if i have said it,
>> >> unless it agrees with your own reason
>> >> and your own common sense.
>> >>
>> >> -- Buddha
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > -----
>> > Arnaud Héritier
>> > http://aheritier.net
>> > Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com
>> > Twitter/Skype : aheritier
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>>
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Reply via email to