> On May 8, 2014, 11:38 a.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
> > src/master/http.cpp, line 380
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/19504/diff/9/?file=574761#file574761line380>
> >
> >     Can you link up the review for this TODO so that it depends on this one?

that review depends on the defer being removed from Gauge (review 20995) so i 
can't have it depend on this too.


> On May 8, 2014, 11:38 a.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
> > src/master/master.cpp, lines 3660-3670
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/19504/diff/9/?file=574763#file574763line3660>
> >
> >     Can this go up with the other gauge methods?

it requires Framework to be a complete type so yes, if we move the definition 
of Framework above Master in the header. This felt more disruptive than just 
having this in the source file.


- Dominic


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19504/#review42521
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 8, 2014, 12:01 p.m., Dominic Hamon wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/19504/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 8, 2014, 12:01 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Ben Mahler.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-1132
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1132
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> see summary
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/http.cpp f54c841d003d7a4d2eda5e93405afa358707f4e0 
>   src/master/master.hpp 0a350b0b402edb3ca648c91c920043f66c08fe0e 
>   src/master/master.cpp c79fdafde6b08d74e6fea71afa79aded41b3a9ab 
>   src/tests/master_tests.cpp 939a08d0ed25293d103728864c2b5e79f04a1b42 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19504/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> ran locally and checked /metrics/snapshot vs master/stats.json
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dominic Hamon
> 
>

Reply via email to