----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24020/#review48946 -----------------------------------------------------------
I think it is worth mentioning that we are doing this because _recover solely relies on the information on vethX so we want that port ranges on vethX are always more complete than those on eth0 or lo. also don't we need to loosen some checking for the ephemeral port in _recover as well? - Chi Zhang On July 28, 2014, 11:53 p.m., Jie Yu wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/24020/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated July 28, 2014, 11:53 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Chi Zhang and Ian Downes. > > > Repository: mesos-git > > > Description > ------- > > See summary. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/slave/containerizer/isolators/network/port_mapping.hpp dd1db7f > src/slave/containerizer/isolators/network/port_mapping.cpp 5645e20 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24020/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > sudo make check > > > Thanks, > > Jie Yu > >
