> On Oct. 22, 2014, 9:23 a.m., Niklas Nielsen wrote:
> > src/examples/test_module.hpp, lines 51-52
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/26906/diff/7/?file=728685#file728685line51>
> >
> >     Why not just return the string directly?
> >     
> >     return "TestModule"
> 
> Niklas Nielsen wrote:
>     Ah - never mind. It is because you return a pointer and the string needs 
> to reside somewhere :-/

Reopening - returning "TestModule" will not give you an address on the stack 
but a pointer to the string in the data segment. You should be fine returning 
directly instead of having it backed by a static.


- Niklas


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26906/#review57808
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Oct. 22, 2014, 10:39 a.m., Kapil Arya wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/26906/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 22, 2014, 10:39 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Niklas Nielsen.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Introduced a new kind<T>() function that returns the string representation of 
> the module "kind". This function is specialized for each module "kind".  Also 
> introduced a templatized contains<T>(moduleName) that returns true only if a 
> module of name "moduleName" and kind "T" is available.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/module.hpp 5205e30c7b8228eced9793aef2348930180811bb 
>   src/examples/test_module.hpp b5cc2fa9147c4fe9a1f2eb3e8c2c2565ea7f7420 
>   src/module/manager.hpp 1c93ac4707e3c5dc8acaaa23861b62d3d3921125 
>   src/tests/module_tests.cpp e92d8717427e259b1fa26b3f17719fd616a748c7 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/26906/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Added a new test and ran make check.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Kapil Arya
> 
>

Reply via email to