> On Nov. 10, 2014, 1:50 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote: > > 3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/future.hpp, line 1186 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/27826/diff/2/?file=757271#file757271line1186> > > > > Can we avoid the need for this with a separate change to use ABORT when > > failure() is called on a non-failed future? Much like we do for try, > > result, option.
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27831/ - Dominic ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27826/#review60686 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Nov. 10, 2014, 1:12 p.m., Dominic Hamon wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/27826/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Nov. 10, 2014, 1:12 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos and Ben Mahler. > > > Bugs: MESOS-1694 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1694 > > > Repository: mesos-git > > > Description > ------- > > see summary > > > Diffs > ----- > > 3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/future.hpp > 46ae16b0bbce79005f5ed8711be663eeeb8f4bcf > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27826/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check. > manual review of calling code. > > > Thanks, > > Dominic Hamon > >
