> On Feb. 4, 2015, 11:47 a.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote: > > Ben, I like the refactor you've done. A special thanks goes for updating > > comments for clarity and brevity. Below are my 2ยข on naming. > > > > In general, the naming of executors and executor drivers in our codebase is > > a bit ambiguous. We have basic executor that lives in `exec.cpp` which is > > usually called the "executor driver", but we also have the executor driver, > > say `MesosExecutorDriver`, which is not relevant here. Therefore I can't > > decide what is the best name for the timeout that lives in `exec.cpp`, I > > opted for `ExecGracePeriod`, you for `ExecutorDriverGracePeriod`. Maybe we > > can come up with a better, less ambigouos name? > > > > Again, `ExecutorGracePeriod` IMO doesn't reflect that this timeout lives in > > containerizer. The innermost timeout, which you renamed to > > `CommandExecutorGracePeriod`, can be in theory used by other "real" > > executors, that's why I gave it a more general name. But most probably > > custom executors will use the parameter from `ExecutorInfo`, so let's leave > > `CommandExecutorGracePeriod`.
Thanks for the feedback! Two important notes: > We have basic executor that lives in exec.cpp which is usually called the > "executor driver", but we also have the executor driver, say > MesosExecutorDriver, which is not relevant here. (1) exec.cpp is not a basic executor, it's the executor driver. The executor driver is the library that executors leverage, think of the `ExecutorProcess` as being an internal part of the driver, not an executor in its own right. This is why I call it the `executorDriverGracePeriod`, make sense? > Again, ExecutorGracePeriod IMO doesn't reflect that this timeout lives in > containerizer. (2) It doesn't live in the containerizer, it lives in the slave :) This is why I call it slave::getExecutorGracePeriod. > The innermost timeout, which you renamed to CommandExecutorGracePeriod, can > be in theory used by other "real" executors, that's why I gave it a more > general name. (3) Are you expecting executors to have access to graceful_shutdown.hpp, or am I missing something? > On Feb. 4, 2015, 11:47 a.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote: > > src/slave/graceful_shutdown.hpp, lines 22-23 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/30580/diff/1/?file=846975#file846975line22> > > > > This is not necessary here: we take `Duration` as a function parameter, > > which means the caller already has access to `Duration`; and we do not > > manipulate `Duration` instances. An include in `.cpp` suffices. We haven't been relying on transitive includes in general, that gets difficult to manage unless you have #include tooling. > On Feb. 4, 2015, 11:47 a.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote: > > src/slave/graceful_shutdown.cpp, line 67 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/30580/diff/1/?file=846976#file846976line67> > > > > I think a `CHECK` is too strong. It would be nice to have validation in > > flags loading functionality, though. I've added a TODO to have a EXECUTOR_SHUTDOWN_GRACE_PERIOD_MAXIMUM as well, in: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30601/ - Ben ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30580/#review70949 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Feb. 4, 2015, 2:14 a.m., Ben Mahler wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/30580/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Feb. 4, 2015, 2:14 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov, Niklas Nielsen, and Vinod Kone. > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > This is a pure cleanup to clarify the documentation and naming around > graceful shutdown. > > Note that I also namespaced the methods differently. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/exec/exec.cpp aada24664dba9060a92230e25689c89852585443 > src/launcher/executor.cpp 1cf28f168cac6e8c7e98686a35509c2b4e052504 > src/slave/constants.hpp 761cfafb3b1b342af4d1dbdb2dec39a45dd62794 > src/slave/flags.hpp 0f6cc41d60a2e3bc2121cc438351135541ef99ba > src/slave/graceful_shutdown.hpp 59f5cfba032a81b5f69c2dd1bc1d96527686127c > src/slave/graceful_shutdown.cpp 04d8f091dfc5a007ac46ccc91c7ff7bfe620b524 > src/slave/slave.cpp a8b262174ab5c9a524db8318d3d1438cd75a702b > src/tests/gc_tests.cpp 454f0974833ad5db8b504a36b010cc72c3a19751 > src/tests/slave_tests.cpp e7e2af63da785644f3f7e6e23607c02be962a2c6 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30580/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check > > > Thanks, > > Ben Mahler > >
