1) Mesos Agent maybe? Agent (in law e.g.) is someone acting on behalf of other person. That is right what we have, mesos-slave isn't a worker and shouldn't be - it should let others work. 2) mesos-agent Although I personally like Google terminology - Borg master and borglet, Omega master and omlet. Any thoughts? 3) Master is OK. 4) Start fixing documentation and change code/binaries in some major release with other backward incompatible changes.
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015, 18:45 Chris Aniszczyk <[email protected]> wrote: > 1) Mesos Worker > 2) Mesos Worker > 3) no, I'm OK with Mesos Master > 4) announce the change as part of a new release and deprecate the old names > publicly; this may also be a good time to consider crafting an official > deprecation policy for the project so we're transparent with how > deprecation will work in the future > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Connor Doyle <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > 1. Mesos Worker [node/host/machine] > > 2. Mesos Worker [process] > > 3. No, master/worker seems to address the issue with less changes. > > 4. Begin using the new name ASAP, add a disambiguation to the docs, and > > change old references over time. Fixing the "official" name, even before > > changes are in place, would be a good first step. > > > > -- > > Connor > > > > > > > On Jun 1, 2015, at 14:18, Adam Bordelon <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > There has been much discussion about finding a less offensive name than > > "Slave", and many of these thoughts have been captured in > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1478 > > > > > > I would like to open up the discussion on this topic for one week, and > > if we cannot arrive at a lazy consensus, I will draft a proposal from the > > discussion and call for a VOTE. > > > Here are the questions I would like us to answer: > > > 1. What should we call the "Mesos Slave" node/host/machine? > > > 2. What should we call the "mesos-slave" process (could be the same)? > > > 3. Do we need to rename Mesos Master too? > > > > > > Another topic worth discussing is the deprecation process, but we don't > > necessarily need to decide on that at the same time as deciding the new > > name(s). > > > 4. How will we phase in the new name and phase out the old name? > > > > > > Please voice your thoughts and opinions below. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > -Adam- > > > > > > P.S. My personal thoughts: > > > 1. Mesos Worker [Node] > > > 2. Mesos Worker or Agent > > > 3. No > > > 4. Carefully > > > > > > > -- > Cheers, > > Chris Aniszczyk > http://aniszczyk.org > +1 512 961 6719 >
