-1 master/worker -1 master/agent -1 leader/follower +1 master/slave; no change needed
There's no technical benefit **at all** to a terminology change at this point. If people want to change the names in their client presentations that's fine. Master/slave conveys specific meaning that is lost otherwise. In this context of this project (and elsewhere in Engineering-related fields) the terms are technical jargon and have no social implications within such context. On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Till Toenshoff <toensh...@me.com> wrote: > 1. Mesos Worker [node/host/machine] > 2. Mesos Worker [process] > 3. No, master/worker seems to address the issue with less changes. > 4. Begin using the new name ASAP, add a disambiguation to the docs, and > change old references over time. Fixing the "official" name, even before > changes are in place, would be a good first step. > > > +1 > -- James DeFelice 585.241.9488 (voice) 650.649.6071 (fax)
