So, since we had a sync last week, our next sync would be next week (Thursday 29th), but Mesosphere is having a company offsite then. Would somebody from Twitter/elsewhere be able to host next week? Or maybe Niklas/Kapil, who won't be in Mexico? We need to have at least one committer/PMC present. If nobody volunteers to host, we can just defer to the following week (Thursday Nov 5th).
Since last week's sync was at 9am, the next one should be at 3pm? On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Michael Park <mcyp...@gmail.com> wrote: > The result of this poll was: > > Bi-weekly: 12 > Weekly: 10 > > So while pretty even, bi-weekly wins the vote. Let's proceed with bi-weekly > community syncs and we can always reevaluate going forward. > > Thanks, > > MPark. > > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 10:51 PM zhiwei <zhiw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 bi-weekly > > > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Alexander Rojas < > alexan...@mesosphere.io> > > wrote: > > > > > +1 bi-weekly (and I as bernd have been assuming rotating times) > > > > > > > On 15 Oct 2015, at 19:19, Michael Park <mcyp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly or > bi-weekly > > > > (once every 2 weeks). > > > > > > > > There were differing opinions on the subject during the community > sync > > > > today. > > > > > > > > An argument for weekly: meetings can be shorter and missing a meeting > > > won't > > > > be as big a deal as missing a longer meeting. > > > > > > > > An argument for bi-weekly: there are many people involved in these > > > > meetings, we should keep it infrequent so that it reduces people's > time > > > > commitments. > > > > > > > > This email is intended to capture your +1s or other ideas you might > > have! > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > MPark. > > > > > > > > >
