+1 for weekly. Best Regards, Diana Arroyo darr...@us.ibm.com
From: tommy xiao <xia...@gmail.com> To: dev@mesos.apache.org Date: 10/16/2015 07:20 AM Subject: Re: Community Sync Interval +1 for bi-weekly. 2015-10-16 17:36 GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske <be...@mesosphere.io>: > +1 for bi-weekly and I have been assuming rotating times in the first > place, as I suspect many others as well. > > (9am and 3pm are not very far apart. Probably better to go for 8am and 5pm > or something like that.) > > > On Oct 16, 2015, at 11:08 AM, haosdent <haosd...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > If we rotating times, weekly reasonable. I think 9am and 9pm(Pacific) OK > > for UTC+8. > > > > +1 weekly, with rotating times. And do we need confirm host places? > > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Adam Bordelon <a...@mesosphere.io> > wrote: > > > >> Wow, split crowd. Keep in mind that we also want to adjust the times to > >> better accommodate people in different time zones. This could mean > >> something like 9am, 3pm, 9pm, 3pm (Pacific). If we do one of these a > week, > >> then we end up with bi-weekly 3pm meetings, for those on the west coast > >> that don't want to wake up early or stay up late. And we can still > include > >> Europe and Asia with the early/late meetings, so they get to attend at > >> least one a month, hopefully with at least a one committer present. > >> Nobody's expected to attend every meeting, but those who crave weekly > >> meetings have a chance. > >> > >> +1 weekly, with rotating times. Let's decide soon, so we can get it on > the > >> calendar! > >> > >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Klaus Ma <kl...@cguru.net> wrote: > >> > >>> +1 for weekly > >>> > >>> Agree with a shorter weekly meeting to sync up, make progress step by > >> step > >>> > >>> > >>> On 2015年10月16日 10:49, Yong Qiao Wang wrote: > >>> > >>>> +1 for bi-weekly. > >>>> > >>>> Regards! > >>>> > >>>> Yong Qiao Wang（王勇桥） > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> From: Jojy Varghese <j...@mesosphere.io> > >>>> To: dev@mesos.apache.org > >>>> Date: 16/10/2015 09:01 > >>>> Subject: Re: Community Sync Interval > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> +1 bi-weekly > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Oct 15, 2015, at 5:42 PM, Isabel Jimenez > >>>>> > >>>> <contact.isabeljime...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> +1 for bi-weekly > >>>>> > >>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Alex Rukletsov <a...@mesosphere.com > > > >>>>> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> +1 for bi-weekly. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Elizabeth Lingg > >>>>>> > >>>>> <elizab...@mesosphere.io > >>>> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> +1 Weekly > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -Elizabeth > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Thursday, October 15, 2015, Greg Mann <g...@mesosphere.io> > wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I agree with Daniel, +1 for weekly and we can re-evaluate in a bit > to > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> see > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> how people are liking it. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Guangya Liu <gyliu...@gmail.com > >>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Guangya > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Daniel Mercer < > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> dmer...@fantoccini.com > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> <javascript:;>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> +1 for weekly -- if this results in diminishing returns we can > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> always > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> reset > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> to biweekly. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Kapil Arya < > ka...@mesosphere.io > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Jan Schlicht < > j...@mesosphere.io > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> +1 for weekly. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Artem Harutyunyan < > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> ar...@mesosphere.io <javascript:;>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for weekly. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:41 AM, haosdent < > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> haosd...@gmail.com > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> <javascript:;>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Michael Park < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> mcyp...@gmail.com <javascript:;> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> or > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> bi-weekly > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> (once every 2 weeks). > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There were differing opinions on the subject during the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> community > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> sync > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> today. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> An argument for weekly: meetings can be shorter and > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> missing > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> a > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> meeting > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> won't > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> be as big a deal as missing a longer meeting. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> An argument for bi-weekly: there are many people involved > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> these > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> meetings, we should keep it infrequent so that it reduces > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> people's > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> time > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> commitments. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This email is intended to capture your +1s or other ideas > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> might > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> have! > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MPark. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Haosdent Huang > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Jan Schlicht* > >>>>>>>>>>>> Distributed Systems Engineer, Mesosphere > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> -- > >>> Da (Klaus), Ma (马达) | PMP® | Advisory Software Engineer > >>> Platform Symphony/DCOS Development & Support, STG, IBM GCG > >>> +86-10-8245 4084 | mad...@cn.ibm.com | http://www.cguru.net > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Best Regards, > > Haosdent Huang > > -- Deshi Xiao Twitter: xds2000 E-mail: xiaods(AT)gmail.com
